2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2019.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Natural Killer Cell Receptors Stick to Cell–Cell Adhesion Proteins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tumor cells achieve tumor infiltration by secreting various proteolytic enzymes that disrupt cell–cell adhesion 67 . In addition, cell adhesion molecules are involved in regulating NK cell function 68 . Comparing the differences in somatic mutations, we found that the frequency of mutations in GNA11 and BAP1 was higher in the high-risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tumor cells achieve tumor infiltration by secreting various proteolytic enzymes that disrupt cell–cell adhesion 67 . In addition, cell adhesion molecules are involved in regulating NK cell function 68 . Comparing the differences in somatic mutations, we found that the frequency of mutations in GNA11 and BAP1 was higher in the high-risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structural basis for the CD96-CD155 interaction involves the “ancillary key” motif that is critical for CD155 recognition; moreover, CD96 and CD155 interact via the “lock-and-key” docking mode (79). However, surprisingly, a comparison between three anti-CD96 mAbs, including two that block the CD96-CD155 interaction (3.3 and 6A6) and one that does not block this interaction (8B10), revealed that although the two blocking mAbs showed higher potency than the non-blocking mAb in the control of metastases, it was not necessary to block the CD96-CD155 interaction to promote NK cell antimetastatic functions (80, 81). In contrast, another study using a transgenic mouse model of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma showed that a mAb targeting the CD96-CD155 interaction (6A6) significantly reduced distant metastases, while a mAb that did not target the CD96-CD155 interaction (8B10) showed no effect on the frequency of metastases (82).…”
Section: Immunoglobulin Superfamilymentioning
confidence: 99%