2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How non-conventional machining affects the surface integrity and magnetic properties of non-oriented electrical steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it should be noted that such a significant width of the damaged zone is not confirmed in other works. It was stated that the influence of the abrasive waterjet cutting on electromagnetic properties is minimal and can essentially be neglected in the case of the non-alloyed grade [47,72,73].…”
Section: Simulation Models Of Changes In Electromagnetic Properties C...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be noted that such a significant width of the damaged zone is not confirmed in other works. It was stated that the influence of the abrasive waterjet cutting on electromagnetic properties is minimal and can essentially be neglected in the case of the non-alloyed grade [47,72,73].…”
Section: Simulation Models Of Changes In Electromagnetic Properties C...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both cutting technologies induce an important deterioration of macroscopic properties of electrical steel in comparison to less damaging methods such as waterjet (WJ) [ 26 ] and electrical discharge machining (EDM) [ 27 , 28 ]. Winter et al [ 29 ] analyzed the effect of pulsed laser, abrasive waterjet, wire electrical discharge machining, and continuous wave laser methods on the magnetic properties of non-oriented 2.4 wt.% Si ring samples with 0.2 mm thickness. The main conclusion was that the abrasive waterjet machining determined the lowest core losses and applied magnetic field strength since the continuous wave laser induced the highest core losses and lowest saturation magnetic flux density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest magnetic permeability value and the lowest losses were measured in the case of photo corrosion cut samples, and the laser-cut materials exhibited the highest coercive force and the lowest remanent magnetic flux density. The previously presented analyses [ 22 , 27 , 28 , 29 ], evidenced that the wire cut method is characterized by a minimum impact on the magnetic properties of the electrical steel but concomitantly showed its main drawbacks such as sample burned coating due to local high-temperature apparition [ 30 ] and low cutting speed [ 31 ]. Paltanea et al [ 32 ] compared mechanical and waterjet cutting techniques’ effects on NO FeSi with 0.5 mm and 0.65 mm thicknesses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanical cutting such as blanking or shear-slitting requires precise control of many processing parameters depending on the thickness of the material being shaped. These are most often cutting speed [3], cutting clearance [4], rounding of the edges of cutting tools, rake angle of the knife (guillotining), or vertical clearance (shear-sitting) [5]. If there is no knowledge of how to select these parameters, the products obtained after the process may have numerous defects, such as roll-over and wavy cut edges, burrs, and edge cracks [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%