2008
DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(08)34018-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Often are Potential Patient Safety Events Present on Admission?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
106
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
106
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, there were some diagnoses coded as postadmit and thus identified in step 1 of our study that clinical experts recognized as being improperly coded. Limited published findings from both Canada 31,32 and the US [33][34][35] suggest that the accuracy of diagnosis timing information is not perfect, and that it may vary across jurisdictions, hospitals, and conditions. Overreporting of conditions as being POA may cause underdetection of adverse events, whereas other conditions that are accurately coded as postadmit may have resulted from the trajectory of illness, which started before admission and was unresponsive to appropriate treatment (eg, delirium or renal failure in a patient admitted with sepsis).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, there were some diagnoses coded as postadmit and thus identified in step 1 of our study that clinical experts recognized as being improperly coded. Limited published findings from both Canada 31,32 and the US [33][34][35] suggest that the accuracy of diagnosis timing information is not perfect, and that it may vary across jurisdictions, hospitals, and conditions. Overreporting of conditions as being POA may cause underdetection of adverse events, whereas other conditions that are accurately coded as postadmit may have resulted from the trajectory of illness, which started before admission and was unresponsive to appropriate treatment (eg, delirium or renal failure in a patient admitted with sepsis).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measures of undesirable events include the following risk-adjusted PSIs that Savitz et al (2005) indicate are sensitive to nurse staffing: failure to rescue, infection due to medical care, postoperative respiratory failure, and postoperative sepsis. Decubitus ulcer and postoperative pulmonary embolism (PE) or deep vein thrombosis (DVT) are also nurse-sensitive measures of quality; however, Houchens et al (2008) found that a high percentage of these events are present on admission (POA). Therefore, they are not valid measures of hospital quality, except in data systems that include POA information., and we exclude them from our study.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerns exist about the validity of administrative codes, [7][8][9] and it can be difficult to determine from discharge diagnostic codes whether a disease entity existed before the patient was hospitalized or occurred during the hospital admission. 10,11 With the rapid expansion of electronic medical record (EMR) use, along with increased federal support for health care information technology, a far richer source of clinical information regarding hospital-related safety events has emerged. 12 The development of automated approaches, such as natural language processing, that extract specific medical concepts from textual medical documents that do not rely on discharge codes offers a powerful alternative to either unreliable administrative data or labor-intensive, expensive manual chart reviews.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%