2015
DOI: 10.1080/1369183x.2015.1082288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How ordinary people view Muslim group rights in Britain, the Netherlands, France and Germany: significant ‘gaps’ between majorities and Muslims?

Abstract: Taking four countries-Britain, the Netherlands, France and Germanywith distinct state approaches and public debates over accommodating Muslims, we study the views of ordinary people from the majority and Muslim populations on Muslim group rights. We compare their responses to questions on mosque-building, teachers wearing religious symbols, and religious classes in schools, to determine whether there is a significant 'gap' between the majority and Muslim minorities. We find highly significant 'gaps' between th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ninth article, authored by Schlueter, Masso, and Davidov (2020), 'What factors explain anti-Muslim prejudice? A comparative assessment of Muslim population size, institutional characteristics and immigration-related media claims', examines potential explanations that could account for differences between countries in levels of anti-Muslim prejudice (Statham 2016). The results indicate that a larger share of Muslims in the population, more liberal integration policies and greater state support of religion are all associated with lower levels of negative attitudes toward Muslim immigration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The ninth article, authored by Schlueter, Masso, and Davidov (2020), 'What factors explain anti-Muslim prejudice? A comparative assessment of Muslim population size, institutional characteristics and immigration-related media claims', examines potential explanations that could account for differences between countries in levels of anti-Muslim prejudice (Statham 2016). The results indicate that a larger share of Muslims in the population, more liberal integration policies and greater state support of religion are all associated with lower levels of negative attitudes toward Muslim immigration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, while a large body of the literature has studied negative sentiments towards immigrants in general, only few studies exist that focus on variations in negative attitudes towards Muslim immigrants in particular (Fetzer and Soper, 2005). But it is this latter group of immigrants and their descendants that currently represent a prime target of negative attitudes among many citizens of European nation states (see, e.g., Strabac and Listhaug 2008;Helbling 2014;Statham 2016; see also the study of Heath and Richards, 2018 in this volume).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large diversity makes it problematic to speak of a single Muslim “community” in Europe, or in one particular European country. Yet, within and across countries, Muslims with a strong religious group identification and a strict religious orientation can be expected to show important similarities in beliefs, values, and norms for behavior (e.g., Statham, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%