2005
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How organisations evaluate their knowledge management projects: a meta-study of the period 1992–2002

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides bibliometrics, previous studies have used other methods to analyze the emerging trends in the knowledge management literature. For example, Loermans and Fink (2005) applied the meta-analysis techniques to understand what organizations are measuring within the context of knowledge management evaluation. Also, various other studies identify and analyze the knowledge management articles with a narrow scope and have used limited literature related to knowledge management (Noor et al , 2020; Pellegrini et al , 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides bibliometrics, previous studies have used other methods to analyze the emerging trends in the knowledge management literature. For example, Loermans and Fink (2005) applied the meta-analysis techniques to understand what organizations are measuring within the context of knowledge management evaluation. Also, various other studies identify and analyze the knowledge management articles with a narrow scope and have used limited literature related to knowledge management (Noor et al , 2020; Pellegrini et al , 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While knowledge management may only have been a relatively recent issue for business organisations (Loermans and Fink, 2005), it has always been core to the affairs of academia (Tian et al, 2009). Over time the academic setting has changed and we can now observe the increasing impact of information and communications technology (ICT) on knowledge management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the OKM framework overcomes most of the fifteen barriers to KM identified by Weber. As a recommendation, the authors suggested the company conduct a long-term evaluation for the application of the present framework to validate its effectiveness regarding the 12 evaluation factors identified by companies to evaluate their KM projects (Loermans & Fink, 2005). The aim of this paper was to develop an OKM framework adapted to manual manufacturing operations by integrating the literature regarding the SECI model into the OKM requirement of ISO 9001:2015.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%