2021
DOI: 10.7554/elife.63107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How oscillating aerodynamic forces explain the timbre of the hummingbird’s hum and other animals in flapping flight

Abstract: How hummingbirds hum is not fully understood, but its biophysical origin is encoded in the acoustic nearfield. Hence, we studied six freely hovering Anna's hummingbirds, performing acoustic nearfield holography using a 2176 microphone array in vivo, while also directly measuring the 3D aerodynamic forces using a new aerodynamic force platform. We corroborate the acoustic measurements by developing an idealized acoustic model that integrates the aerodynamic forces with wing kinematics, which shows how the timbr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Body mass and wing size of the recorded specimens were not measured; however, such characteristics are observably different between the four species, and the difference in wingbeat frequency may be attributable to this difference in size. Body mass is a strong predictor of radiated acoustic power as the aerodynamic forces needed to stay aloft must be proportionally larger for heavier insects [85]. Past research demonstrates that variation in wingbeat frequency can be best described by incorporating body mass and wing area, of which the relative importance is 17.3% and 67.2%, respectively [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Body mass and wing size of the recorded specimens were not measured; however, such characteristics are observably different between the four species, and the difference in wingbeat frequency may be attributable to this difference in size. Body mass is a strong predictor of radiated acoustic power as the aerodynamic forces needed to stay aloft must be proportionally larger for heavier insects [85]. Past research demonstrates that variation in wingbeat frequency can be best described by incorporating body mass and wing area, of which the relative importance is 17.3% and 67.2%, respectively [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These software solutions also allow the fine-scale kinematics of animals’ motion and/or postures/poses to be related to other streams of data, such as contemporaneous acoustic ( 18 , 19 ) or neural ( 20 ) recordings. Appropriate experimental design and methodology is crucial, however, as indoor environments (usually limited in space, volume, and complexity) can be divorced from conditions that give rise to the behaviors themselves and may even cause the animals to exhibit a limited set of behaviors ( 21 , 22 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In courtship display, peacock feathers perform the train-rattling using a range of vibration frequencies (22-28 Hz); higher damping of feathers broadens the resonant peaks and has the advantage of quickly damping out oscillations [29]. In addition to furnishing flight, the various acoustic communication functions are served by pressure waves when birds flap their wings [30]. The flag model was used to explain the fluttering and accompanying sound by the outermost tail feathers, that subtle changes in shape tune the produced sound frequency [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%