2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-18142-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How people with disabilities influence crowd dynamics of pedestrian movement through bottlenecks

Abstract: Despite considerable research efforts, most controlled empirical studies on crowd movement usually rely on homogeneous crowds, i.e., research participants are typically young adults without disabilities. Consequently, relatively little is known about pedestrian movement in more diverse and heterogeneous crowd conditions, e.g., when persons with reduced mobility are present. This gap may be particularly relevant at bottlenecks, along the path of a moving crowd, that limit the capacity of pedestrian flow. Here, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was most efficient to pass through the bottleneck without a wheelchair or luggage, and carrying luggage was less disruptive than using a wheelchair in such scenarios. Overall, our findings support previous work (e.g., [26]), suggesting that increased heterogeneity changes crowd dynamics. This adds to the growing evidence challenging the status quo of existing approaches to estimate capacities and key performance values of crowd movement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was most efficient to pass through the bottleneck without a wheelchair or luggage, and carrying luggage was less disruptive than using a wheelchair in such scenarios. Overall, our findings support previous work (e.g., [26]), suggesting that increased heterogeneity changes crowd dynamics. This adds to the growing evidence challenging the status quo of existing approaches to estimate capacities and key performance values of crowd movement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…An important question is what the underlying mechanisms of the differences between heterogeneous and homogeneous crowds are. Previous work has found anecdotal evidence that pedestrians keep a larger distance from wheelchair users [26]. This change in behavior may have cascading effects on microscopic and macroscopic movement parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Overall, our findings support previous work (e.g., [26], suggesting that increased heterogeneity changes crowd dynamics. This adds to the growing evidence challenging the status quo of existing approaches to estimate capacities and key performance values of crowd movement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In [6], a series of experiments was presented in which 252 participants with and without visible defects, moving in a crowd, took part. Each experiment involved groups of participants moving down a corridor with a narrowing path at the end.…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%