2004
DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x04250117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How plausible is the motherese hypothesis?

Abstract: Falk's hypothesis is attractive and seems to be supported by data from primatology and language acquisition literature. However, this etiological narrative presents a fairly low degree of plausibility, the result of two epistemological fallacies: an implicit reliance on a unilinear model of causality and the explicit belief that ontogeny is homologous to phylogeny. Although this attempt to retrace the early emergence of prelinguistic capacities in hominins falls short of producing a compelling argument, it doe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Motherese has been found to occur in cultures globally (Gogate, Maganti, & Bahrick, 2015; Grieser & Kuhl, 1988; Papoušek, Papoušek, & Symmes, 1991; Trehub, Unyk, & Trainor, 1993a, 1993b). This has led to suggestions that it evolved as a way of supporting mother–infant interactions and facilitating nurturing while babies are at a relatively early stage of neurological development (Bouissac, 2004), with the simple melodic arches of motherese being cognitively easier to process than words. In support of this, infants have been shown to engage their attention more in response to motherese rather than standard talking (Fernald, 1985; Kitamura, Guellaï, & Kim, 2014; Pegg, Werker, & McLeod, 1992; Santarcangelo & Dyer, 1988), as well as respond with vocalizations (Pelaez, Virués-Ortega, & Gewirtz, 2011), and demonstrate emotional synchronicity with their mothers (Saint-Georges et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motherese has been found to occur in cultures globally (Gogate, Maganti, & Bahrick, 2015; Grieser & Kuhl, 1988; Papoušek, Papoušek, & Symmes, 1991; Trehub, Unyk, & Trainor, 1993a, 1993b). This has led to suggestions that it evolved as a way of supporting mother–infant interactions and facilitating nurturing while babies are at a relatively early stage of neurological development (Bouissac, 2004), with the simple melodic arches of motherese being cognitively easier to process than words. In support of this, infants have been shown to engage their attention more in response to motherese rather than standard talking (Fernald, 1985; Kitamura, Guellaï, & Kim, 2014; Pegg, Werker, & McLeod, 1992; Santarcangelo & Dyer, 1988), as well as respond with vocalizations (Pelaez, Virués-Ortega, & Gewirtz, 2011), and demonstrate emotional synchronicity with their mothers (Saint-Georges et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motherese and singing have simple melodic arches which are cognitively easier to process than words. Both are therefore able to support mother-infant communication and language development while newborns are at a relatively early stage of neurological development (Bouissac, 2004).…”
Section: The Power Of Musicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Music plays an important part in language development. The simple melodic arches used in singing and motherese are cognitively easier to process than words, so they support mother-infant communication and language development while babies are at a relatively early stage of neurological development (116). Reports of benefits for language development extend across early years and childhood (117,118), as well as benefits for auditory skills development (including auditory discrimination and attention (119)), reading ability (120) and language skills (including pitch perception (121-123)).…”
Section: Speech and Languagementioning
confidence: 99%