2022
DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2022.2086329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Political Efficacy Relates to Online and Offline Political Participation: A Multilevel Meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is especially the case during salient elections: as Rolfe (2016) described, "Higher-intensity campaigns make politics and the upcoming election more salient, not only in increased political discussion among friends, but also in other prominent cues that may indicate to citizens that their friends, neighbors, and coworkers care about the election," (100). Mobilizing people to participate is now even easier given the advent of the Internet and social media, evidenced by studies that suggested online participation is less dependent on resources and location (e.g., Lin and Trujillo 2022), equally as impactful on feelings of efficacy compared to offline participation (Oser, Boulianne, and Halperin 2022), and that it can mediate voter turnout (Settle et al 2016).…”
Section: Recruitment Socialization and Mobilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially the case during salient elections: as Rolfe (2016) described, "Higher-intensity campaigns make politics and the upcoming election more salient, not only in increased political discussion among friends, but also in other prominent cues that may indicate to citizens that their friends, neighbors, and coworkers care about the election," (100). Mobilizing people to participate is now even easier given the advent of the Internet and social media, evidenced by studies that suggested online participation is less dependent on resources and location (e.g., Lin and Trujillo 2022), equally as impactful on feelings of efficacy compared to offline participation (Oser, Boulianne, and Halperin 2022), and that it can mediate voter turnout (Settle et al 2016).…”
Section: Recruitment Socialization and Mobilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To demonstrate this point, we took the recent paper by Oser et al (2022). This paper was selected because 1) the paper was published in Political Communication, a high impact journal that awards Open Science Badges; 2) shared data and R code are available; and most importantly, 3) the shared R code is well-written.…”
Section: Recover a Removed Bioconductor Packagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper was selected because 1) the paper was published in Political Communication, a high impact journal that awards Open Science Badges; 2) shared data and R code are available; and most importantly, 3) the shared R code is well-written. In the repository of this paper, we based on the materials shared by Oser et al (2022) and prepared a research compendium that should have long-term computational reproducibility. The research compendium is similar to the Executable Compendium suggested by the Turing way.…”
Section: Recover a Removed Bioconductor Packagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the scholarship has evolved to explore how people can use digital media for political participation (Boulianne, 2020; Ruess et al, 2021). We might expect political efficacy to be a predictor of online political participation, just as it has been used to predict offline political participation (Oser et al, 2022). The rise of social media thus makes the study of efficacy and digital media use more interesting because social media are not merely information media that contribute to political efficacy; they are also participatory media, whose use is driven by political efficacy.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%