2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2020.102153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How post-crisis regulation has affected bank CEO compensation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These simple statistics are consistent with Cerasi et al (2020) who argue that the structure of remuneration of CEOs has changed and become in line with the Principles for Sound Compensation Practices (FSF, 2009) that apply to banks through CRD IV. However, they also find that the remuneration of the CEOs in banks that were not subject to the regulatory change has also changed during the same period.…”
Section: Structure Of Remunerationsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…These simple statistics are consistent with Cerasi et al (2020) who argue that the structure of remuneration of CEOs has changed and become in line with the Principles for Sound Compensation Practices (FSF, 2009) that apply to banks through CRD IV. However, they also find that the remuneration of the CEOs in banks that were not subject to the regulatory change has also changed during the same period.…”
Section: Structure Of Remunerationsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Such a finding proves to corroborate well that achieved by Bebchuk et al (2011), suggesting that the extent of the agency dispute appears to get rather intensified in presence of a strong CEO dominance. This is consistent with previous findings of Cerasi et al (2020) which indicate that greater compensation is highly advantageous in mitigating risk in the banking sector. These results proof that CEO dominance tends to increase agency costs and has an impact risk-taking.…”
Section: Multivariate Analysessupporting
confidence: 93%
“…According to Kotidis and Schreft (2022), the practice of blockchain development and integration is becoming increasingly popular and can be applied to public administration, key government agencies, and the financial sector, which will be reliably protected from external influence. Cerasi et al (2020) believes that the practice of implementation will constantly evolve and cover new sectors of the financial environment. Sumets et al (2022) argues that an essential factor in financial institutions' cybersecurity is to conduct specialized training for the staff on digital literacy and work with information technology.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%