2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10182-011-0158-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How precise is the finite sample approximation of the asymptotic distribution of realised variation measures in the presence of jumps?

Abstract: Realised variance, Realised multipower variation, Truncated realised variance, Inference, Stochastic volatility, Jumps,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A time‐varying version of r(x) (may be stochastic) is considered in Reference 19. The specific setting of the parameters c and ω are also discussed in Reference 29, supported by a great deal of simulation studies.…”
Section: Theoretical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A time‐varying version of r(x) (may be stochastic) is considered in Reference 19. The specific setting of the parameters c and ω are also discussed in Reference 29, supported by a great deal of simulation studies.…”
Section: Theoretical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Aït-Sahalia and Jacod (2009b) point out that the value of c should be proportional to the "average" value of σ t , which could be consistently estimated by the multi-power variation estimator mentioned above. The specific setting of the parameters c and ω are also discussed in Veraart (2011), supported by a great deal of simulation studies.…”
Section: Finite Activity Jumpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the realised multi-power variation estimator is mainly biased by large jumps but is less affected by small jumps, while on the contrary, the truncated realised volatility is problematic in removing small jumps but eliminates large jumps effectively. In Veraart (2011), the properties of these two estimators are analyzed and compared comprehensively, their finite sample performances are verified by numerous Monte Carlo studies under different models. Furthermore, a combination of these two estimators breeds a new estimator called truncated realized multi-power variation estimator therein, which achieves the best effect of finite sample performance, since such a combination compensates the weaknesses of these two estimators.…”
Section: Finite Activity Jumpmentioning
confidence: 99%