2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.07.24.219253
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How predictability affects habituation to novelty?

Abstract: One becomes accustomed to repeated exposures, even for a novel event. In the present study, we investigated how predictability affects habituation to novelty by applying a mathematical model of arousal that we previously developed, and conducted a psychophysiological experiment to test the model prediction. We formalized habituation to novelty as a decrement in Kullback-Leibler divergence from Bayesian prior to posterior (i.e., information gain) representing arousal evoked from a novel event through Bayesian u… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the P300 amplitude declined over time for both types of operation responses. Previous studies have shown that the P300 amplitude decreased with repeated presentation using simple and passive stimulus (Polich, 1989;Lew and Polich, 1993;Polich and McIsaac, 1994;Romero and Polich, 1996;Ravden and Polich, 1998;Pan et al, 2000;Wintink et al, 2001;Kececi et al, 2006;Fonken et al, 2019;Barry et al, 2020;Ueda et al, 2020). Those findings are consistent with the current findings of the attenuation of the P300 amplitude to the operation response during repeated product manipulation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the P300 amplitude declined over time for both types of operation responses. Previous studies have shown that the P300 amplitude decreased with repeated presentation using simple and passive stimulus (Polich, 1989;Lew and Polich, 1993;Polich and McIsaac, 1994;Romero and Polich, 1996;Ravden and Polich, 1998;Pan et al, 2000;Wintink et al, 2001;Kececi et al, 2006;Fonken et al, 2019;Barry et al, 2020;Ueda et al, 2020). Those findings are consistent with the current findings of the attenuation of the P300 amplitude to the operation response during repeated product manipulation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In a series of studies on brain activity related to habituation to stimuli using the P300, Polich et al showed that the P300 amplitude was attenuated by repeated exposure to the stimuli (Polich, 1989;Lew and Polich, 1993;Polich and McIsaac, 1994;Romero and Polich, 1996;Ravden and Polich, 1998;. In recent years, several studies have also examined the habituation to stimuli using P300 (Pan et al, 2000;Wintink et al, 2001;Kececi et al, 2006;Mars et al, 2008;Fonken et al, 2019;Barry et al, 2020;Ueda et al, 2020). However, they have all investigated habituation to simple or passive stimuli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%