2015
DOI: 10.1080/00913367.2015.1085818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Product-Plot Integration and Cognitive Load Affect Brand Attitude: A Replication

Abstract: International audienceMarketers are progressively using product placements to counteract technology that enables consumers to skip advertisements. However, consumers are increasingly multitasking while they watch videos, which might affect placement effectiveness. In France we conceptually replicate research on product–plot integration and multitasking that was originally conducted in the United States to analyze how different levels of cognitive charge influence this phenomenon. Results show that participants… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this is a practice frequently applied in experimental studies exploring cognitive load ( Chow and Luk, 2006 ; Elder and Krishna, 2010 ; Yoon et al, 2011 ), on the one hand, it may cause stress and discomfort among participants; on the other, it is somewhat artificial. As Pantoja et al (2016) suggest, the application of common subtitles in a film is sufficient to induce cognitive load, even when the titles are in a language the participant knows fluently. Additionally, it must not be ignored that asking the subjects to tackle a mathematical task alone may cause increased fear of being evaluated ( Rosenthal, 2009 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although this is a practice frequently applied in experimental studies exploring cognitive load ( Chow and Luk, 2006 ; Elder and Krishna, 2010 ; Yoon et al, 2011 ), on the one hand, it may cause stress and discomfort among participants; on the other, it is somewhat artificial. As Pantoja et al (2016) suggest, the application of common subtitles in a film is sufficient to induce cognitive load, even when the titles are in a language the participant knows fluently. Additionally, it must not be ignored that asking the subjects to tackle a mathematical task alone may cause increased fear of being evaluated ( Rosenthal, 2009 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also why we decided to include conditions of cognitive load in the experimental design of our study. This is a very popular approach in product placement studies – e.g., in the study carried out by Pantoja et al (2016) , the researchers also decided to investigate the effectiveness of remembering the content promoted through the use of product placement depending on the cognitive load of the subjects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) suggests that people use their cognitive ability to process message or information and are persuaded by what they see and experience. Thus, the ELM advocates that low cognitive ability is represented by the low involvement elaborative condition, while the high cognitive ability is represented by the high involvement elaborative condition (Pantoja, Rossi & Borges, 2016;Petty & Cacioppo, 1986;Olsen, Slotegraaf & Chandukala, 2014). The cognitive ability is predominantly assessed by the need for cognition (NFC).…”
Section: Need For Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El tamaño de la muestra fue definido en base a la recomendación de los autores de un estudio pasado similar (Pantoja, Rossi & Borges, 2016). Se contactó a los autores del artículo y su recomendación fue seguir la misma metodología que ellos emplearon.…”
Section: Poblaciónunclassified
“…Para el cuestionario se desarrollaron preguntas en el formato de escala diferencial semántico para medir tanto las actitudes de las participantes hacia la marca (Pantoja et al, 2016;Yoon et al, 2011) como las actitudes de las participantes hacia el anuncio (Pantoja et al, 2016;Yoon et al, 2011;McKenzie et al, 1989). Se desarrollaron preguntas en el formato de escala diferencial semántico de 7 puntos para 8 ítems: Odio/Amor, Triste/Encantado, Irritado/Feliz, Tenso/Calmado, Aburrido/Emocionado, Molesto/Relajado, Disgusto/Aceptación y Dolor/Alegría (Pantoja, et al 2016).…”
Section: Instrumentosunclassified