“…Altogether, twenty-nine of the examined studies applied this definition. Twenty-two of them (Studies 1 and 2 by Van Doorn and Verhoef [99]; Larceneux et al [8]; Bauer et al [100]; Schuldt and Hannahan [12], Stage 2; Ellison et al [101]; Gorissen and Weijters [85], Study 3; Prada et al [102], Experiments 1 and 2; Lee et al [103], Studies 1 and 2; Scholl-Grissemann [104], Studies 1 and 2; Amos et al [105], Study 1; Besson et al [56], Study 2; Küst [106]; Septianto et al [107], Study 1 and 2; Nadricka et al [108], Studies 1, 2, and 3; Parker et al [76], Study 1b) examined the effect of an organic label on hypothetical products (v HAO − v HB ), and six (Van Doorn and Verhoef [99], Study 3; Guilabert and Wood [132]; Hemmerling et al [127]; Laureati et al [128]; Kiss et al [133]; Apaolaza et al [126]) on organic products (v OAO − v OB ). One study (Johansson et al [130]) investigated the effect of a false organic label appearing on a conventional product (v CAO − v CB ).…”