2019
DOI: 10.1108/el-01-2019-0006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How reading in single- and multiple-column types influence our cognitive load: an EEG study

Abstract: Purpose The impact of different screen-based typography styles on individuals’ cognitive processing of information has not been given much consideration in the literature, though such differences would imply different learning outcomes. This study aims to enrich the current understanding of the impact of reading in single- and multiple-column types on students’ cognitive processing. Design/methodology/approach An electroencephalogram (EEG) was used to record and analyze the brain signals of 27 students while… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be particularly difficult while reading on-screen texts, where aids such as using a pen or a finger are harder to use. In line with this observation is a study by Al Samarraie and Price who shows that a two-column layout required a reduced cognitive load, as revealed at EEG [27]. Reading long straight lines could then impair the ability to search for information and leap to the next idea [28].…”
Section: A Useful Choice?mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This can be particularly difficult while reading on-screen texts, where aids such as using a pen or a finger are harder to use. In line with this observation is a study by Al Samarraie and Price who shows that a two-column layout required a reduced cognitive load, as revealed at EEG [27]. Reading long straight lines could then impair the ability to search for information and leap to the next idea [28].…”
Section: A Useful Choice?mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The results also showed that both icons and symbols were highly perceived by Arab users. One reason to this is that the intended context can be recognized more quickly with icons and images than by reading a text message or label (Al-Samarraie et al , 2019 b , 2019 c ). This finding is in line with the work of Meyer and Bernier (2010) and Al-Samarraie et al .…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participants silently read each of the three passages in a single column, two columns, and three columns. Al-Samarraie et al (2019) found that less energy was used up in participants reading passages in a two-column format compared to the single and three-column format. The study informs designers on how to minimise cognitive load and maximise a learner's cognitive performance when designing textual documents.…”
Section: Columns and Cognitive Processingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A more recent study by Al-Samarraie et al (2019) studied the effects of column number and cognitive load while reading. To measure cognitive load, they performed electroencephalography (EEG; a method that measures brain activity during a task).…”
Section: Columns and Cognitive Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%