1987
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)91922-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Reliable Are Commercial Allergy Tests?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When hair from nine subjects with fish allergy and nine control subjects was sent blind to three hair analysis laboratories, widely discordant and inconsistent results were obtained. 83 Therapeutic advice in naturopathy covers hydrotherapy, sunlight, diet, fresh air, relaxation, and exercise. '6 Nothing more than tradition and anecdote support the use of these approches and no clear guidelines for their use are given.…”
Section: Naturopathymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When hair from nine subjects with fish allergy and nine control subjects was sent blind to three hair analysis laboratories, widely discordant and inconsistent results were obtained. 83 Therapeutic advice in naturopathy covers hydrotherapy, sunlight, diet, fresh air, relaxation, and exercise. '6 Nothing more than tradition and anecdote support the use of these approches and no clear guidelines for their use are given.…”
Section: Naturopathymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been claimed that it is possible to diagnose allergies/intolerances by analysing the hair content of metals and micronutrients. There is one controlled trial showing that the results of the test are completely random and that the variability among different operators and laboratories approximates 100% [91]. Iridology was proven to be completely unreliable and not supported by scientific evaluations as well [92].…”
Section: Complementary/alternative Diagnostic Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is one controlled trial showing that the results of the test are completely random and that the variability among different operators and laboratories approximates 100% [107]. Iridology was proven to be completely unreliable and not supported by scientific evaluations [108].…”
Section: Other Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%