2015
DOI: 10.1363/intsexrephea.41.4.0210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Reliable Are Reports of Early Adolescent Reproductive and Sexual Health Events In Demographic and Health Surveys?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Amongst the 223 newly identified sexually active students, this trend was observed again, the majority of these students were under 17 years old. This finding is congruent with other studies which have shown that young women 15–19 years were less willing to report marriages and first births before age 15 than were women from the same group when asked again five years later [12]. This unwillingness to report sexual activity is likely due to broader cultural and social factors which govern the acceptability of sexual activity amongst students [11, 12, 38].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Amongst the 223 newly identified sexually active students, this trend was observed again, the majority of these students were under 17 years old. This finding is congruent with other studies which have shown that young women 15–19 years were less willing to report marriages and first births before age 15 than were women from the same group when asked again five years later [12]. This unwillingness to report sexual activity is likely due to broader cultural and social factors which govern the acceptability of sexual activity amongst students [11, 12, 38].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Previous research suggests particular difficulty in identifying sexually active young women [2, 12]. Using MSAP variables we were able to identify an additional 223 potentially sexually active students, and almost double the number of those newly identified were young women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may be prone to either intentional or unintentional recall bias around age at first birth, and in particular there is some evidence that very young adolescent births may be under-reported: a previous study suggests this is most likely when using a sample of 15–19 year olds [40], so our use of a sample of 20–29 year old women should minimise this. Further potential bias may be introduced as the survey will record the birth at the place where the mother was residing at the time of the survey, not where she was at the time of the birth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work by Neal and Hosegood (2015) provides further reason to avoid using women of different ages to estimate trends. The authors documented significant inconsistencies in the reporting of reproductive events among women born in the same cohort but interviewed at different ages.…”
Section: Measures Of Age At First Marriage In Demographic and Health mentioning
confidence: 99%