2017
DOI: 10.3390/rs9070740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Reliable Is Structure from Motion (SfM) over Time and between Observers? A Case Study Using Coral Reef Bommies

Abstract: Recent efforts to monitor the health of coral reefs have highlighted the benefits of using structure from motion-based assessments, and despite increasing use of this technique in ecology and geomorphology, no study has attempted to quantify the precision of this technique over time and across different observers. This study determined whether 3D models of an ecologically relevant reef structure, the coral bommie, could be constructed using structure from motion and be reliably used to measure bommie volume an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Approximately 3,000 images per site were used as source data for photogrammetric reconstruction, resulting in detailed and accurate three‐dimensional digital models (cf. Casella et al, ; Ferrari et al, ; Raoult, Reid‐Anderson, Ferri, & Williamson, ; Storlazzi, Dartnell, Hatcher, & Gibbs, ). We created photomosaic maps and 3D digital elevation models (DEM) for each of our five study sites (Figure a, c).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Approximately 3,000 images per site were used as source data for photogrammetric reconstruction, resulting in detailed and accurate three‐dimensional digital models (cf. Casella et al, ; Ferrari et al, ; Raoult, Reid‐Anderson, Ferri, & Williamson, ; Storlazzi, Dartnell, Hatcher, & Gibbs, ). We created photomosaic maps and 3D digital elevation models (DEM) for each of our five study sites (Figure a, c).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, every fifth video-frame was extracted. Approximately 3,000 images per site were used as source data for photogrammetric reconstruction, resulting in detailed and accurate three-dimensional digital models (cf Casella et al, 2017;Ferrari et al, 2018;Raoult, Reid-Anderson, Ferri, & Williamson, 2017;Storlazzi, Dartnell, Hatcher, & Gibbs, 2016)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three-dimensional reconstructions can also be used for volumetric analyses to track temporal changes in the habitat structure and/or for obtaining data on the distribution of benthic species after exporting them as orthophotomosaics [14,18,19]. While the use of photogrammetric techniques requires more time for post-survey data processing than in situ observations, it potentially generates high-resolution data [14] with relatively high precision and accuracy [20], and it is less prone to observer bias [21]. Image acquisition for 3D reconstruction is also less time consuming in the field than in situ (i.e., underwater) methods that are commonly used to characterize either the habitat structure (e.g., chain-and-tape rugosity and Habitat Assessment Scores [5]) or benthic cover [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowing the best possible results in underwater conditions remains a research gap. Recently, an effort has been made to assess the influence of photo density (the number of photos per m 2 ) on volume-area (Raoult et al, 2017) and rugosity measurements (Bryson et al, 2017). Although most software manuals recommend a minimum overlap between photos to ensure correct bundle adjustments and accurate models [80% overlap + 60% side-overlap (Agisoft, 2018)], it proved difficult to quantify the influential factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%