1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.11060419.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How repeat measurements affect the mean diameter of the umbilical vein and the ductus venosus

Abstract: Blood flow measurement in the fetus is susceptible to substantial error. Increased numbers of measurements can improve the precision. To quantify this, we assessed how the number of ultrasound measurements affected the calculation of individual mean diameters of fetal veins. A study of the umbilical vein (UV) and ductus venosus (DV) was carried out in 167 pregnancies in a clinical setting. The UV diameter was measured 2-13 times in 163 participants and the DV for the same number of times in 158. A one-way anal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
58
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
58
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The 6% difference may be ascribed to technique (this study measured between valves at the ostium), or to chance. Knowing the variability of such measurements in the fetus 31,32 , particularly diameter measurements, we restricted error by repeating measurements 12,33 and by using a single operator. Coefficients of variation of 8.4 and 7.7%, and intraclass correlations of 94 and 97% for the diameter of the aorta and pulmonary artery, respectively, ensured that the study gave a fair representation of normal and abnormal flows.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 6% difference may be ascribed to technique (this study measured between valves at the ostium), or to chance. Knowing the variability of such measurements in the fetus 31,32 , particularly diameter measurements, we restricted error by repeating measurements 12,33 and by using a single operator. Coefficients of variation of 8.4 and 7.7%, and intraclass correlations of 94 and 97% for the diameter of the aorta and pulmonary artery, respectively, ensured that the study gave a fair representation of normal and abnormal flows.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repeat measurement has shown to reduce random error (21) and was practiced for all diameter measurements in the study. Because less susceptible to error than intensity weighted mean velocity, we used the time averaged V max corrected by a velocity profile factor for flow calculation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vessel diameter was measured in a perpendicular insonation to the vessel wall. Diameter was measured repeatedly (UV, LPV, PV: median 4 times, DV: median 5) to reduce random error (21) and the mean diameter was used for further analysis. At the same site, with an insonation along the vessel axis, flow velocities (time-averaged maximum flow velocity, TAMXV) were measured using pulsed Doppler.…”
Section: Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important source of variation is the error of measurement in small vessels. The diameter measurement in small vessels (0.5-2.5 mm) has an upper 95% con®dence limit of 0.15 mm when the diameter is determined as the average of ®ve measurements 15 . We are not sure that our assumption of a circular cross-section is valid for this section of the vein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, the measurement was done as a transection to obtain a circular cross-section. The diameter was determined as an average of $5 repeat measurements 15 . The blood velocity was recorded at the same site but in a new insonation along the long axis of the vessel and with an expanded sample volume, in order to include the entire cross-section of the vessel.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%