1973
DOI: 10.1109/tpc.1973.6592691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How rhetoric confuses scientific issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1994
1994
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Or rather, in line with universal principles of taking specialized knowledge out of its specialized adornment and re-draping it in standard, observational language: "You need to find ways to translate your research into words that a lay audience can understand…So I mean I think in criminology and criminal justice, just as in other specialized fields, we have a specialized language but I think it's incumbent on us to explain what those terms mean…" (Author 35). In this sense, clear scientific writing is discussed as separating science and rhetoric (Miller, 1979), where complicated words are seen as bloated, loaded language or the production of false knowledge that obscures reality (Cox & Roland, 1973). Thus in line the universal view of social science writing, absolute communication identifies that "knowing is seeing" (Abbott & Eubanks, 2005, p. 192) where complex material can be distilled into simple words that transcend community boundaries.…”
Section: It Is Clarity": Clarity In a Universal Versus A Socio-culturmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Or rather, in line with universal principles of taking specialized knowledge out of its specialized adornment and re-draping it in standard, observational language: "You need to find ways to translate your research into words that a lay audience can understand…So I mean I think in criminology and criminal justice, just as in other specialized fields, we have a specialized language but I think it's incumbent on us to explain what those terms mean…" (Author 35). In this sense, clear scientific writing is discussed as separating science and rhetoric (Miller, 1979), where complicated words are seen as bloated, loaded language or the production of false knowledge that obscures reality (Cox & Roland, 1973). Thus in line the universal view of social science writing, absolute communication identifies that "knowing is seeing" (Abbott & Eubanks, 2005, p. 192) where complex material can be distilled into simple words that transcend community boundaries.…”
Section: It Is Clarity": Clarity In a Universal Versus A Socio-culturmentioning
confidence: 99%