2011
DOI: 10.1080/00091383.2011.568898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Robust Are the Findings ofAcademically Adrift?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
70
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
70
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Arum and Roksa (2011) drew attention to the fact that, in their study, a significant proportion of students showed no growth at all. Pascarella, Blaich, Martin and Hanson (2011) replicated Arum and Roksa's study, found closely matching results and concluded that Arum and Roksa's findings should be taken seriously. Arum and Roksa attributed the overall limited growth in CT to students becoming more and more academically adrift.…”
Section: Ct In Hesupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Similarly, Arum and Roksa (2011) drew attention to the fact that, in their study, a significant proportion of students showed no growth at all. Pascarella, Blaich, Martin and Hanson (2011) replicated Arum and Roksa's study, found closely matching results and concluded that Arum and Roksa's findings should be taken seriously. Arum and Roksa attributed the overall limited growth in CT to students becoming more and more academically adrift.…”
Section: Ct In Hesupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Examples of such technologies include Clickers (Oigara & Keengwe, 2013), WebCT (Blasco-Arcas, Buil, Hernandez-Ortega, & Sese, 2013), ClassQue (Robbins, 2011), and poll-sheet (Gain, 2013) to name a few. Higher education has recently received considerable criticism as researchers have suggested that undergraduates learn little while they are in school (Arum & Roksa, 2011;Pascarella, Blaich, Martin, & Hanson, 2011). Business education has received some of the harshest criticism as studies have found business undergraduates spend less time studying and have smaller gains on standardized tests than other undergraduates (Glenn, 2011).…”
Section: Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Business education has received some of the harshest criticism as studies have found business undergraduates spend less time studying and have smaller gains on standardized tests than other undergraduates (Glenn, 2011). These problems are likely partially attributable to business students' lack of engagement and accountability, problems that are aggravated by large class sizes at many colleges and universities (Arum & Roksa, 2011;Hedgcock & Rouwenhorst, 2014;Pascarella et al, 2011). An increasingly adopted classroom technology to address these issues is student response systems (or "clickers"; Hedgcock & Rouwenhorst, 2014;Hoanca, 2013;Oigara & Keengwe, 2013).…”
Section: Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have shown that undergraduate students" scores on standardized measures of critical thinking and complex reasoning improve very little while they are in college (Arum & Ruska, 2011, Pascarella et al, 2011. While methodological limitations can make interpretation of these findings challenging and controversial (Pascarella et al, 2011), less debatable are the interpretations of data on student engagement and time spent studying.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While methodological limitations can make interpretation of these findings challenging and controversial (Pascarella et al, 2011), less debatable are the interpretations of data on student engagement and time spent studying. For instance, Roska & Arum (2011) found the typical undergraduate studied 12 hours a week during their sophomore year and that almost 40 percent of sophomores spent less than 5 hours a week studying independently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%