Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Abstract: Previous literature stressed on the gender differences in job satisfaction and the factors influencing the job satisfaction of men and women. Two rationales are usually provided for the finding that women tend to be relatively more satisfied with their jobs than men although disadvantaged in labour markets: first, women may have relatively lower expectations of career and income, and second, they may attach relatively less importance to extrinsic rewards than men. In order to analyse whether substantial gender differences exist already at the beginning of the career, we employ information of over 20000 graduates collected through a large-scale survey of German university graduates who recently entered the labour market. We find that the job satisfaction of female graduates is on average slightly lower than the job satisfaction of male graduates, but our results do not point to substantial gender differences. , 1987;Hull, 1999;Kaiser, 2007) than men's. At first glance, this seems to be somewhat surprising, since there is ample evidence that women are disadvantaged in labour markets. They are less likely to climb the career ladder, their salaries are often lower than those of men, even if they do comparable jobs, and they have more difficulties in finding jobs matching their qualification (Hodson, 1989;Weinberger, 1998;Azmat et al., 2006).
Terms of use:
Documents in EconStor mayThe literature on job satisfaction offers two major explanations for these apparently paradox findings: First, it is argued that the relatively high level of job satisfaction of women may be explained by their relatively low expectations (Sloane and Williams, 2000; Sousa-Poza and Sousa-Poza, 2000). Long (2005) and Clark (1997), for instance, find that women have lower expectations of promotion prospects or pay from work as compared to men. Second, it is argued that women's valuation of job satisfaction is shaped by other job attributes as men's.While income and career opportunities may be less important for women, women may attach more importance to job attributes such as interesting work content and good work schedules (Bokemeier and Lacy, 1987;Clark, 1997;Babcock et al., 2003;Bender et al., 2005 1997). Third, and most importantly, our data allows for an investigation including both the level of importance attached to job attributes and the perception of actual job rewardsdistinct for the different job attributes analysed. Thus, we are able to directly test the hypothe...