1992
DOI: 10.1016/0169-5347(92)90073-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How should we define ‘fitness’ for general ecological scenarios?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
1,112
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 988 publications
(1,118 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
1,112
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the fecundity function F , an expression of R m is derived in A. Invasion fitness is the long-term exponential growth rate of a mutant in an environment set by the resident (Metz et al, 1992). A mutant may invade the resident, if it has positive invasion fitness.…”
Section: The Metapopulation Fitness R Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Given the fecundity function F , an expression of R m is derived in A. Invasion fitness is the long-term exponential growth rate of a mutant in an environment set by the resident (Metz et al, 1992). A mutant may invade the resident, if it has positive invasion fitness.…”
Section: The Metapopulation Fitness R Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evolutionary branching is a process in which the trait of an evolving monomorphic population first approaches a so-called singular trait, but then disruptive selection causes the population to become dimorphic, i.e., to contain two different resident traits, and these two traits evolve away from each other (Metz et al, 1992(Metz et al, , 1996Geritz et al, 1997Geritz et al, , 1998. When mutations are so frequent that there is no clear separation between ecological and evolutionary timescales, evolutionary branching means that a unimodal trait distribution first concentrates around the singular strategy, and then the distribution becomes bimodal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of selection coefficients (s) to measure relative fitness was adopted since the latter can be interpreted as the difference between the long-run (logarithmic) growth rates of the invader and resident population 14 .…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, environmental feedback, which is generally essential for understanding all but the most simple effects of natural selection, is not yet addressed by these earlier models. By contrast, adaptive dynamics theory (Metz et al, 1992Dieckmann and Law, 1996;Geritz et al, 1997Geritz et al, , 1998 has been devised as a general framework to analyze the phenotypic evolutionary dynamics of populations under environmental feedback. It is only very recently that adaptive dynamics theory has been extended to function-valued strategies (Dieckmann et al, 2004), and applied to maturation reaction norms (Ernande et al, 2004) and resource utilization strategies (Heino et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%