How social roles shape interpersonal affect regulation at work

Abstract

Individuals often attempt to influence the affective states of others in the workplace. Such interpersonal affect regulation (IAR) occurs across social settings that are characterized by distinct roles and relationships between actors and targets. However, it is unclear whether and how IAR processes and outcomes differ across settings as pertinent research has developed in separate organizational literatures with different research traditions that have thus far not been compared or integrated. In addition, despite the social nature of IAR, the types of relationships between the actor engaging in IAR and the target of IAR have rarely been considered in prior research. Here, we present an integrative framework to establish why and how social roles at work shape motivation, strategies, and affective outcomes of IAR across three core actor-target configurations in organizations. Specifically, we theorize how internal-vertical, internal-horizontal, and external social role configurations influence IAR. We provide integrative insights into the nature and implications of IAR in organizations and generate a comprehensive agenda for future research on IAR.

Why do People Engage with the Suffering of Strangers? Exploring Epistemic, Eudaimonic, Social, and Affective Motives

“…In analyzing when and why people engage with others' suffering, it is important to distinguish between engagement with the hardship of a stranger versus the hardship of a personally close other. In the case of a close other, engagement tends to be a given and the key question is what form the engagement takes (e.g., different strategies of interpersonal emotion regulation; (Groth et al, 2023;Kalokerinos et al, 2017). In the case of a stranger, engaging with the suffering could be costly (Cameron et al, 2019) and there are no interpersonal demands equivalent to those in close relationships, nor would there be lasting interpersonal consequences when dismissing the experience.…”