2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2014.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How stable is the core discussion network?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is particularly notable with students after graduation (Bidart & Lavenu, ; Roberts & Dunbar, ; Suitor & Keeton, ). These findings are consistent with more recent studies on student networks (Small, ; Small, Pamphile, & McMahan, ). The “persistent and pervasive” (Hampton, 2016) connectivity facilitated by mobile media may help to compensate for these network declines by helping teens engage their peer‐networks (Boyd, ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This is particularly notable with students after graduation (Bidart & Lavenu, ; Roberts & Dunbar, ; Suitor & Keeton, ). These findings are consistent with more recent studies on student networks (Small, ; Small, Pamphile, & McMahan, ). The “persistent and pervasive” (Hampton, 2016) connectivity facilitated by mobile media may help to compensate for these network declines by helping teens engage their peer‐networks (Boyd, ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We used item-level imputation for all scale and index measures (Gottschall, West, & Enders, 2012; Shrive, Stuart, Quan, & Ghali, 2006). We restrict qualitative analyses to interviews occurring within 12 months of the PK2 survey ( N = 43), as networks evolve with members’ changing obligations and routine activities (Small, Deeds Pamphile, & McMahan, 2015). We used two-sample t -tests to determine whether the qualitative sample differed from the quantitative sample, finding comparability across all covariates except that the qualitative sample is slightly older.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure individuals' social networks and social capital, sociologists have examined individuals' core discussion network (Burt, 1984;Marsden, 1987;McPherson, Smith-Lovin, & Brashears, 2009;Small, Deeds Pamphile, & McMahan, 2015), typically using the "name generator module," which asks survey respondents to list the set of individuals they regularly turn to when discussing important matters. Adapting from these past studies, we gave participants the following instructions: "From time to time, most people discuss important matters with other people.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%