2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2021.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How strand exchange protein function benefits from ATP hydrolysis

Abstract: Members of the RecA family of strand exchange proteins carry out the central reaction in homologous recombination. These proteins are DNA-dependent ATPases, although their ATPase activity is not required for the key functions of homology search and strand exchange. We review the literature on the role of the intrinsic ATPase activity of strand exchange proteins. We also discuss the role of ATP-hydrolysis-dependent motor proteins that serve as strand exchange accessory factors, with an emphasis on the eukaryoti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most straightforward interpretation is that the translocase activity of RAD54 proteins is responsible for removing recombinases from dsDNA. Such unproductive association of RAD51 or DMC1 with unbroken DNA has been proposed to reflect a relatively weak preference for ssDNA over dsDNA compared to bacterial RecA recombinases (Reitz et al, 2021). Thus, our observation that C. elegans RAD-51 exhibits a similar propensity for promiscuous association with unbroken DNA that is antagonized by RAD-54.B implies that this property is a conserved aspect of eukaryotic recombinases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most straightforward interpretation is that the translocase activity of RAD54 proteins is responsible for removing recombinases from dsDNA. Such unproductive association of RAD51 or DMC1 with unbroken DNA has been proposed to reflect a relatively weak preference for ssDNA over dsDNA compared to bacterial RecA recombinases (Reitz et al, 2021). Thus, our observation that C. elegans RAD-51 exhibits a similar propensity for promiscuous association with unbroken DNA that is antagonized by RAD-54.B implies that this property is a conserved aspect of eukaryotic recombinases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that in the absence of RPA, we found that human RAD51 similarly binds to ssDNA or dsDNA (Supplementary Figure S3 A), in contrast to Saccharomyces cerevisiae’s Rad51 or Escherichia coli’s RecA recombinases, which exhibit a preferencial affinity for ssDNA. This specific property of hRAD51 raises the question of whether there is a transitory binding of RAD51 to dsDNA that should be negatively regulated, as observed in some contexts in vivo [65].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However RAD51 was shown to display faster association on ssDNA in correlation with higher ssDNA flexibility [85,86] but slower dissociation from dsDNA, the RAD51-dsDNA filament being stable once formed [87]. It has been proposed that The presence of RAD51 on dsDNA has been evidenced in vivo in certain contexts, especially in the absence of RAD54-like proteins that desassemble toxic dsDNA-bound RAD51 complexes and prevent accumulation of nonrepair-associated RAD51 foci, pointing here again to the cooperation of important factor in the regulation RAD51 [65,[88][89][90]. in spite of the fact that only filaments assembled on ssDNA are functional for homology search and strand exchange, one could still imagine that the transient and ephemeral polymerization of RAD51 on dsDNA would play a role, especially in the remodeling of certain DNA-protein complexes.…”
Section: Particular Properties Of Human Rad51 Nucleofilamentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the depletion of DSS1 in human cells disables HR repair (Kristensen et al, 2010). BRCA2 also prevents the binding of RAD51 to dsDNA (Carreira et al, 2009;Jensen et al, 2010), a binding that is inhibitory for the DNA strand exchange (reviewed in Reitz et al, 2021). Human BRCA2 protein diffuses in the cell within oligomeric complexes (Reuter et al, 2014;Paul et al, 2021).…”
Section: Brca2mentioning
confidence: 99%