How students design and enact physics lessons: Five immigrant caribbean youth and the cultivation of student voice

Abstract

An array of data suggests that low‐income, minority students are excluded from a high‐quality physics education. The education literature proposes that cultivating student voice in classrooms helps youth feel a deeper, more meaningful connection with school. However, limited data exist in the physics education literature on how student voice is expressed. The purpose of this study was to use critical ethnography to explore how student voice developed in the context of a ninth‐grade conceptual physics class. I developed case studies of five immigrant Caribbean youth from student, family and teacher interviews, participant observations and field notes. I relied on grounded theory as an analytic technique. Findings suggest that in expressing voice, youth designed lessons reflective of their identities, leveraged and enhanced their “epistemic” and “positional” authority (two new constructs I propose in this manuscript), and creatively utilized physics and school‐sponsored resources. This information about how students express voice has implications for how they learn physics, how critical theory is connected with physics classroom practice, and how student identity, shared authority and youth agency develop in physics classrooms. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 45: 881–899, 2008

Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study

“…The work of Olitsky (2007) in an eighth grade physical science class also demonstrates that feeling empowered enough to answer questions and to participate actively contributes to identity building in science. Similarly, Basu (2008) found that for five minority physics students, expressing their voice in class “described and/or altered their identities, particularly in how they discussed lesson design as connected with their career goals, intellectual identity, social identity, and beliefs about science.” Thus, expressing their voice helped them build connections with other parts of their identity. How can teachers encourage this type of voluntary participation by students that is critical for identity development?…”

“…How can teachers encourage this type of voluntary participation by students that is critical for identity development? The work of several qualitative researchers (Barton & Tan, 2009; Basu, 2008; Olitsky, 2007; Tan and Barton, 2008) provides meaningful examples: allowing students the opportunity to express their own voice through presentations, establishing a respectful/encouraging classroom atmosphere that minimizes the anxiety of public expression, positively acknowledging students' views, allowing students to see the “backstage” learning struggles (that even a teacher faces) rather than presenting the material from an elite transfer perspective, and, in general, creating hybrid spaces within classrooms.…”

A strategy for incorporating students’ interests into the high‐school science classroom

“…In the United Kingdom, national frameworks guide student consultation (Rudduck & Flutter, 2004), while in Canada, efforts, such as the Manitoba School Improvement Program, consider student voice as a key part of secondary school improvement strategies (Levin, ). Several science educators have incorporated students’ authentic interests into their educational initiatives, mainly in low‐income urban schools (Basu, ; Basu & Calabrese Barton, 2007; Calabrese Barton & Tan, 2009; Furman & Barton, 2006; Seiler, ). This strategy increased students’ engagement and understanding.…”

A Shadow Curriculum: Incorporating Students’ Interests into the Formal Biology Curriculum

“…During the last decade several science educators have drawn on students' voices and knowledge to direct science leaning, mainly in low-income urban schools (Basu and Calabrese Barton 2007;Basu 2008; Calabrese Barton and Tan 2009;Furman and Barton 2006;Seiler 2001). This strategy increased students' engagement and understanding, and was a valuable tool in the process of students' identity formation.…”