2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.pursup.2018.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How supply chain architecture and product architecture impact firm performance: An empirical examination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated coefficient of β=1.19 (t=1.81, p ˃0.05) for the relationship between the adoption of agile practices and cost reduction is significant, indicating support for H 1 d. This finding is consistent with Sharp et al (1999) and Lacerda and Furtado, (2018) and Saeed et al, (2019)'s findings that agile approaches to manufacturing helps companies and institutions reduce costs, achieve greater engineering discipline. The adoption of agile manufacturing practices means facing the reality that customers must be served with small quantities of bespoke products of impeccable quality, delivered on-time, and at very low cost (Sharp et al, 1999).…”
Section: Agile Practices On Cost Reduction (H 1 D)supporting
confidence: 69%
“…The estimated coefficient of β=1.19 (t=1.81, p ˃0.05) for the relationship between the adoption of agile practices and cost reduction is significant, indicating support for H 1 d. This finding is consistent with Sharp et al (1999) and Lacerda and Furtado, (2018) and Saeed et al, (2019)'s findings that agile approaches to manufacturing helps companies and institutions reduce costs, achieve greater engineering discipline. The adoption of agile manufacturing practices means facing the reality that customers must be served with small quantities of bespoke products of impeccable quality, delivered on-time, and at very low cost (Sharp et al, 1999).…”
Section: Agile Practices On Cost Reduction (H 1 D)supporting
confidence: 69%
“…Green et al (2006) claim that if each department of the SC is working to optimize its own value, there will be discontinuities at the interfaces and unnecessary costs will result. Saeed et al (2018) highlighted the role of decisions associated with SC and product architecture in attaining organizational competitiveness. Power 2005, on the other hand, report that the SC integration does not always positively influence the tangible or non-tangible firms' performance and the possible benefits associated with integration are ambiguous (Pagell 2004).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the interaction between a customer and the organization itself is not limited to services sector or marketing practices only. Present organizations are co-designing value with their prospective customers along the customer participative chain (Bel, 2018), from the co-creation of new products and services (Ramaswamy & Ozcan, 2018), to production, distribution, assembly, after sales services till usage (Bettiga & Ciccullo, 2018;Saeed et al, 2018). Generally, the customer is the value co-creator which results in a continuous process of value co-development.…”
Section: Customerization Brand Awareness Image Satisfaction and Lovementioning
confidence: 99%