2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19074305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Symbols and Social Interaction Influence the Experienced Utility of Sustainable Lifestyle Guiding Policies: Evidence from Eastern China

Abstract: As the key to mitigating climate change, a sustainable lifestyle has become a focus of environment policy. Past studies have largely neglected the symbols of sustainable lifestyle guiding policies and failed to capture its effect on the experienced utility of sustainable lifestyle guiding policies (EUSLGP). To address this drawback, symbolic value was incorporated into a model consisting of social interaction and the EUSLGP. With data collected from 3257 respondents in Eastern China, ordinary least squares wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its specific regulatory procedures mainly include voluntary participation [ 16 ], environmental protection information disclosure [ 15 ], and voluntary environmental agreements [ 19 ]. From the perspective of influencing factors, factors such as social interaction [ 20 ], technical efficiency level [ 21 ], and policy sustainability [ 22 ] also affect the implementation effect of environmental regulation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its specific regulatory procedures mainly include voluntary participation [ 16 ], environmental protection information disclosure [ 15 ], and voluntary environmental agreements [ 19 ]. From the perspective of influencing factors, factors such as social interaction [ 20 ], technical efficiency level [ 21 ], and policy sustainability [ 22 ] also affect the implementation effect of environmental regulation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been confirmed that attitude [23], environmental values [24], ecological emotions [25], and perceived behavior control [26] are key variables that influence individual low-carbon consumption behaviors. Cheng et al [27] discovered that symbolic value positively affected personal pro-environmental behavior choices. Taking Portugal and Brazil as examples, Bertooldo and Castro [28] found that class identification was more effective than social norms when forecasting organic food purchase behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%