2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How teams use indicators for quality improvement – A multiple-case study on the use of multiple indicators in multidisciplinary breast cancer teams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[22][23][24][25][26][27][28] The team care concept focuses on ensuring that providers with specific expertise are involved with the patient and the team responsible for the patient's care. 29 Although some specialties and institutions have found MDTs to be costly, inefficient, and lacking in evidence for a positive impact on patient outcomes, 24,27,30 one study demonstrates decreased time to decannulation and LOS for adults with tracheostomies managed by an MDT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22][23][24][25][26][27][28] The team care concept focuses on ensuring that providers with specific expertise are involved with the patient and the team responsible for the patient's care. 29 Although some specialties and institutions have found MDTs to be costly, inefficient, and lacking in evidence for a positive impact on patient outcomes, 24,27,30 one study demonstrates decreased time to decannulation and LOS for adults with tracheostomies managed by an MDT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The articles on professional practices focused on how professionals work together, develop and implement new approaches and make decisions around diagnosis and treatment. Several authors explored the organisation of oncology, including historical studies on the processes of specialisation in gynaecological oncology (Zetka 2011) and the ways teams operated in relation to new initiatives such as quality improvement indicators (Gort et al 2013). The influence of evidence-based medicine on organisational arrangements, professional hierarchies and jurisdictions were also explored Thompson 2011, Broom et al 2009).…”
Section: Professional Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles; [64]) were the focus of this training. Engagement of unit staff and management to support sustainability [50,58,59,65] started during this phase and continues throughout the project.…”
Section: Phases Of the More-2-eat Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key informants and focus group participants reviewed an information letter and provided written consent before the discussion began. These qualitative data will be used to understand the setting and context, including suggestions for making improvements in nutrition care within the unit [55,65]. Both focus groups and interviews were conducted by one researcher to promote consistency.…”
Section: Data Collection Data Collection In the Developmental Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation