2015
DOI: 10.1111/comt.12089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Technology Encourages Political Selective Exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the social-scientific debate about the effects of algorithmic news recommendation on diversity, diversity is often conceptualized as ideologically cross-cutting exposure. For instance, Dylko (2016) examined the effects of user-driven versus system-driven customizable recommendation technology, and found that exposure to system-driven recommendation technology can result in political selective exposure, especially when combined with ideology-based customizability. They regard diversity as a form of selective exposure, as defined as 'proportionally high levels of consumption of information that supports one's political beliefs or attitudes, and proportionally low levels of consumption of information that is counter to one's political beliefs or attitudes' (p. 393).…”
Section: Diversity In the Social Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the social-scientific debate about the effects of algorithmic news recommendation on diversity, diversity is often conceptualized as ideologically cross-cutting exposure. For instance, Dylko (2016) examined the effects of user-driven versus system-driven customizable recommendation technology, and found that exposure to system-driven recommendation technology can result in political selective exposure, especially when combined with ideology-based customizability. They regard diversity as a form of selective exposure, as defined as 'proportionally high levels of consumption of information that supports one's political beliefs or attitudes, and proportionally low levels of consumption of information that is counter to one's political beliefs or attitudes' (p. 393).…”
Section: Diversity In the Social Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the abundant customizability features on social media may make users cognizant of putting themselves into an “echo chamber.” Such realization makes individuals feel guilty for not being open-minded and encourages them to reduce the level of selective exposure (Dylko, 2016). Despite their tendency to select pro-attitudinal news, most Americans believe that exposure to challenging viewpoints is socially desirable and prefer political news sources that provide balanced information (Garrett and Resnick, 2011; Kohut et al, 2010).…”
Section: Incidental Exposure To Counter-attitudinal Information On Famentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding is consistent with past research on the rise of choice in cable television systems (Prior, 2007) and the Internet (Min, 2010). Although some scholars have worried about partisan fragmentation of political information due to increased personalization and selectivity online (e.g., Dylko, 2016; Sunstein, 2007), most empirical work has shown that Internet access does not result in increased avoidance of counterattitudinal information (e.g., Beam & Kosicki, 2014; Flaxman, Goel, & Rao, 2016; Garrett et al, 2013; Messing & Westwood, 2014). Additionally, evidence has shown that Internet users are often inadvertently exposed to cross-cutting political news, ideas, and discussion (Wojcieszak & Mutz, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, research generally shows that political interest is an important variable relative to understanding why attitudes among citizens polarize along party lines around contentious issues (Prior, 2013). This concern has been further highlighted in a time when the public has increased choices regarding media content (Iyengar & Hahn, 2009) and the capability of online programs to present people with information that is consistent with their political views has increased (Beam, 2014; Dylko, 2016). Based on our results, Internet skill could play an important role in further polarizing individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%