2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0248-4900(03)00078-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How the Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope entered Biological Research

Abstract: A history of the early development of the confocal laser scanning microscope in the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Cambridge is presented. The rapid uptake of this technology is explained by the wide use of fluorescence in the 80s. The key innovations were the scanning of the light beam over the specimen rather than vice-versa and a high magnification at the level of the detector, allowing the use of a macroscopic iris. These were followed by an achromatic all-reflective relay system, a non-confocal tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
154
0
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 265 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
154
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Since then, many researchers and optical engineers step by step improved the technical realization (Brakenhoff et al 1979;Davidovi and Egger 1973;Egger and Petran 1967;Hamilton and Wilson 1986;Sheppard and Wilson 1979). The rapid developments in laser and detector technology, along with the onset of fiber optics certainly helped in the rapid dissemination of confocal microscopy into cell biology laboratories around the world (Amos and White 2003).…”
Section: Fluorescence To Study Lipid Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Since then, many researchers and optical engineers step by step improved the technical realization (Brakenhoff et al 1979;Davidovi and Egger 1973;Egger and Petran 1967;Hamilton and Wilson 1986;Sheppard and Wilson 1979). The rapid developments in laser and detector technology, along with the onset of fiber optics certainly helped in the rapid dissemination of confocal microscopy into cell biology laboratories around the world (Amos and White 2003).…”
Section: Fluorescence To Study Lipid Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The disadvantage is its poor rejection of the fluorescence background signal from the cell. Confocal microscopy (middle panel) uses a focused light beam and spatial filtering techniques (pinholes in excitation and detection paths) to eliminate out-of-focus background fluorescence, but at the cost of signal reduction 82 . For the observation of fast dynamics in live cells, a spinning disk confocal setup is often preferred over the relatively slow scanning confocal microscope, which relies on rotating mirrors to scan a focused laser beam in the imaging plane and a point detector, such as avalanche photodiode or photomultiplier tubes, for signal acquisition 81 .…”
Section: Box 2 | Fluorescence Microscopes For Single-virus Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The enzyme-based method is sensitive, easy to automate, and allows a rudimentary analysis of intracellular localization. However, the fluorescent-based methods can be used for detailed subcellular analysis and three-dimensional reconstruction of the cell can be done using confocal microscopy (42). It is thus possible to discriminate not only between nuclear, cytoplasmic, and membrane-bound localization, but also to determine proteins expressed in mitochondria, nucleoli, nuclear membrane, etc.…”
Section: Analysis Using Tissue Microarrays (Tma)mentioning
confidence: 99%