How the Cycladic Islanders Found Their Marbles: Material Engagement, Social Cognition and the Emergence of Keros

Abstract

This paper utilizes Material Engagement Theory (MET), which examines material culture as a dynamic and integral component of human cognitive systems, in order to explore the relationship between Cycladic marble sculpting and the complex social organization evinced at the sites of Dhaskalio and Kavos on the island of Keros. The article shows how the development of Cycladic sculpting in conjunction with transforming settlement patterns suggests that the figurines emerged as part of a kinshipping dynamic. In this context, evidence from the cognitive sciences reveals how Cycladic figurines were profound attention-capturing technologies which shaped the development of intersubjectivity and collective activity. Cycladic marble provided a medium through which a semiotics of value could be generated, circulated and manipulated across the archipelago. The article argues that marble artefacts formed part of a distributed cognitive system which enabled the regional organization of long-range voyaging regimes centred on Dhaskalio-Kavos. The role of Cycladic sculpture in mediating maritime social interactions is clarified by examining the dynamics of social cognition and the organizational burdens of long-range voyaging culture. The relationship between marble, social interaction and longboat voyaging provides a strong explanation for the development and transformation of Keros as well as for broader chronological developments in the region. Cycladic sculpting traditions mediated the shifting burdens upon social cognition during the Early Bronze Age, facilitating the novel forms of social organization in the central Cyclades as a response to both the pressures and the opportunities of the Aegean world. Keros provides an exemplary case study of material culture's role in extending the boundaries of social cognition in ways that enable social complexity to emerge at new scales.

The road to conventional tool use: Developmental changes in children's material engagement with artifacts in nursery school

“…Canonical uses of artifacts, due to their normative and recurrent nature, allow children to flexibly tailor their behaviors to changes in local conditions (Adolph, 2019) and align their behavior with socially promoted general forms of action (Kärtner, 2015). In this sense, material engagement can be seen as a medium (Aston, 2020) to appropriate, sustain, and enact object concepts in early childhood (Alessandroni, 2021). Hopefully, our study will contribute to a better understanding of the constitutive nature of material engagement for cognition and its variations throughout early childhood development.…”

You can’t perform the same ritual twice: minds, materials, automobiles, and the emergence of form

“…Even in the case of something as contemporary and bulky as the automobile, material culture actively integrates conceptual processes with perceptual ones, providing the ability to substantiate and coordinate social cognition through collective attention, interaction and meaning (see also Aston 2020). In the United States, this transformation of locomotion and mobility has produced what Christopher Wells calls a 'car-dependent landscape ' (2013: xxxiii).…”

Materiality and cognitive development: Contemporary debates and empirical studies in early childhood

“…Recent scholarly literature on 5E cognition (i.e., embodied, enactive, extended, embedded, and ecological) has sparked renewed interest in approaches similar to those of Gesell and Gibson. Within this literature, cognition is conceptualized in terms of dynamic interactions between agents and their environments (Gallagher, 2020;Kiverstein & Rietveld, 2021;Newen et al, 2018), while cognitive development is viewed as the incremental enaction of practical skills (e.g., Nonaka & Goldfield, 2018;Travieso et al, 2020;Yakhlef & Rietveld, 2020), habits (e.g., Brinck & Reddy, 2020;Sheets-Johnstone, 2014), recurrent forms of material engagement (e.g., Alessandroni, 2021Alessandroni, , 2023Aston, 2020Aston, , 2022Malafouris, 2019Malafouris, , 2020Prezioso & Alessandroni, 2023), as well as expectations, anticipations, coordinations, and potentials for behaviour that unfold across various timescales (e.g., Adolph, 2019;Ossmy & Adolph, 2020).…”