2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How the foraging decisions of a small ruminant are influenced by past feeding experiences with low-quality food

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the persistence of intake induction through conditioning was short-lived, since when the provision of the nutritious food was discontinued the intake of oat hay converged with values comparable to those observed in the control animals. Moreover, no difference has been observed in the intake of low-quality food between conditioned and unconditioned (i.e., controls) animals in associating the ingestion of a low-quality feed with the subsequent presentation of a nutritious alternative [ 60 , 61 ]; however, this does not necessarily mean that learning has not taken place. The expression of learning is context-dependent, as differences in foraging effort (e.g., constraints in food availability, differences in handling and searching times) may unveil foraging patterns that are not observed when high- and low-quality foods are highly available and thus offer similar foraging efforts.…”
Section: Positive Experience and Use Of Low-quality Feedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, the persistence of intake induction through conditioning was short-lived, since when the provision of the nutritious food was discontinued the intake of oat hay converged with values comparable to those observed in the control animals. Moreover, no difference has been observed in the intake of low-quality food between conditioned and unconditioned (i.e., controls) animals in associating the ingestion of a low-quality feed with the subsequent presentation of a nutritious alternative [ 60 , 61 ]; however, this does not necessarily mean that learning has not taken place. The expression of learning is context-dependent, as differences in foraging effort (e.g., constraints in food availability, differences in handling and searching times) may unveil foraging patterns that are not observed when high- and low-quality foods are highly available and thus offer similar foraging efforts.…”
Section: Positive Experience and Use Of Low-quality Feedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, when conditioned sheep were faced with a choice between a target low-quality food and a high-quality alternative under conditions when foraging efforts to gather those foods were similar, they displayed an almost absolute preference for the high-quality food, similar to values observed for the control animals. However, when access to the high-quality food was restricted in a foraging arena, intake and selection of the low-quality food was much greater in the conditioned animals that previously experienced the ingestion of the low-quality food in association with a high-quality food than the control sheep, which had not experienced such an association [ 60 , 61 ].…”
Section: Positive Experience and Use Of Low-quality Feedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In pastoral ecosystems, herbivores develop grazing mechanisms or tools that make up what is called ingestive behavior [1]. Based on the existing literature, there are two main lines of research on ingestive behavior, one that explores animal response under different environmental conditions, with responses based on conditions extrinsic to animals [2][3][4][5], and the second that studies behavioral responses related directly to the different physiological conditions of animals, making a direct relationship between behavior and their intrinsic characteristics [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%