How the Ligand Field in Lanthanide Coordination Complexes Determines Magnetic Susceptibility Anisotropy, Paramagnetic NMR Shift, and Relaxation Behavior

Abstract

Conspectus Complexes of lanthanide(III) ions are being actively studied because of their unique ground and excited state properties and the associated optical and magnetic behavior. In particular, they are used as emissive probes in optical spectroscopy and microscopy and as contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, the design of new complexes with specific optical and magnetic properties requires a thorough understanding of the correlation between molecular structure and electric and magnetic susceptibilities, as well as their anisotropies. The traditional Judd–Ofelt–Mason theory has failed to offer useful guidelines for systematic design of emissive lanthanide optical probes. Similarly, Bleaney’s theory of magnetic anisotropy and its modifications fail to provide accurate detail that permits new paramagnetic shift reagents to be designed rather than discovered. A key determinant of optical and magnetic behavior in f-element compounds is the ligand field, often considered as an electrostatic field at the lanthanide created by the ligands. The resulting energy level splitting is a sensitive function of several factors: the nature and polarizability of the whole ligand and its donor atoms; the geometric details of the coordination polyhedron; the presence and extent of solvent interactions; specific hydrogen bonding effects on donor atoms and the degree of supramolecular order in the system. The relative importance of these factors can vary widely for different lanthanide ions and ligands. For nuclear magnetic properties, it is both the ligand field splitting and the magnetic susceptibility tensor, notably its anisotropy, that determine paramagnetic shifts and nuclear relaxation enhancement. We review the factors that control the ligand field in lanthanide complexes and link these to aspects of their utility in magnetic resonance and optical emission spectroscopy and imaging. We examine recent progress in this area particularly in the theory of paramagnetic chemical shift and relaxation enhancement, where some long-neglected effects of zero-field splitting, magnetic susceptibility anisotropy, and spatial distribution of lanthanide tags have been accommodated in an elegant way.

Paramagnetic NMR Spectroscopy Is a Tool to Address Reactivity, Structure, and Protein–Protein Interactions of Metalloproteins: The Case of Iron–Sulfur Proteins

“…CCR are relevant when the Curie spin relaxation from Equation (9) becomes the dominant contribution to transverse relaxation, as it typically occurs for systems with large S values and high molecular mass and at very high magnetic fields. Finally, for paramagnetic systems characterized by strong magnetic anisotropy, the scenario can be further complicated: a substantial angular dependence of nuclear relaxation rates has been observed due to relaxation anisotropy [34,35], while significant additional contribution to relaxation have been observed from other cross correlation mechanisms, such as those involving Curie spin relaxation and chemical shift anisotropy [36]. Moreover, in several cases a substantial deviation from the r −6 dependency of PREs has been observed and interpreted as due to non-specific intermolecular PREs [37].…”

“…Attempts to replace classical NMR restraints with paramagnetism-based restraints were only partially successful [160][161][162]. Recent studies provided examples in which the spatial dependence of paramagnetic relaxation deviates from the r MH −6 dependence [34,35].…”

Solution of a Puzzle: High-Level Quantum-Chemical Treatment of Pseudocontact Chemical Shifts Confirms Classic Semiempirical Theory

“… 7 − 15 PCSs are also gaining momentum in the characterization of the electronic structures of single ion magnets. 6 , 16 − 18 …”

Lanthanide Podands with a Short Tripodal Ligand: The Missing Piece of Puzzle

“…The paramagnetic shifts for pyridine protons are more pronounced than those of the N‐anchored tripod L3 . Nevertheless, overall chemical shifts are relatively small because of a weak crystal field is such C 3 ‐symmetrical complexes [28] . The peak assignment is ascertained using two‐dimensional techniques (e. g., 1 H COSY NMR for [Eu L2 ] 3+ in Figure S6).…”

“…Nevertheless, overall chemical shifts are relatively small because of a weak crystal field is such C 3 -symmetrical complexes. [28] The peak assignment is ascertained using two-dimensional techniques (e. g., 1 H COSY NMR for [EuL2] 3 + in Figure S6). 1 1 equivalent.…”