2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How the motor system both encodes and influences our sense of time

Abstract: Several lines of evidence suggest that motoric brain structures may form the core amodal component of a neural network supporting a wide range of timed behaviours. Here, we review recent findings which elucidate the neural computations that occur within motor regions, and in particular the supplementary motor area, in order to support precisely timed actions. Although motor activity may help us represent time, it is also clear that action both enriches and complicates the interpretation of sensory inputs. Henc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
96
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
9
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, beat entrainment in humans is more accurate and precise with auditory than visual metronomes . In this respect, the GAE also suggests that beat‐based timing in humans is a neurocognitive phenomenon that depends on a dynamic interaction between auditory and motor systems in the brain . The idea is that the bidirectional bottom‐up and top‐down interactions between the auditory and motor areas in the brain, including the motor cortico–basal ganglia–thalamo‐cortical circuit, is quite developed and efficient in humans .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, beat entrainment in humans is more accurate and precise with auditory than visual metronomes . In this respect, the GAE also suggests that beat‐based timing in humans is a neurocognitive phenomenon that depends on a dynamic interaction between auditory and motor systems in the brain . The idea is that the bidirectional bottom‐up and top‐down interactions between the auditory and motor areas in the brain, including the motor cortico–basal ganglia–thalamo‐cortical circuit, is quite developed and efficient in humans .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The “vocal learning and rhythmic synchronization” (VLRS) hypothesis proposes that predictive and tempo‐flexible entrainment to an auditory beat is restricted to vocal‐learning species and resulted from the specialization of auditory and motor neural circuitry for vocal learning or vocal motor control . The stronger coupling between audiomotor areas would also explain the auditory superiority in beat entrainment in humans . However, a recent study showed that a California sea lion, a poor vocal learner, can entrain its head bobbing to complex musical stimuli and generalize this skill to a range of novel tempos, challenging the VLRS hypothesis …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, we started our analyses by searching for neural correlates of this effect (Figure ). The first candidate was medial premotor (Crowe, Zarco, Bartolo, & Merchant, ; Merchant, Perez, Zarco, & Gamez, ) or the supplementary motor cortex (SMA) (Coull, Vidal, & Burle, ; Schwartze, Rothermich, & Kotz, ), a core region of the cortico‐thalamic‐basal ganglia circuit (Akkal, Dum, & Strick, ) for time perception (Merchant & Yarrow, ). This region is known to show a “temporal accumulator” activity that slowly grows up as a function of an elapsed time from a stimulus onset (Elbert et al, ; Merchant et al, ; Parker et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beat‐based timing in humans is a complex neurocognitive phenomenon that depends on a dynamic interaction between auditory and motor systems in the brain . This dynamic interaction is hypothesized to be facilitated by bidirectional and potentially causal links between the auditory and motor areas in the brain (Fig.…”
Section: An Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 Beat-based timing in humans is a complex neurocognitive phenomenon that depends on a dynamic interaction between auditory and motor systems in the brain. [35][36][37][38][39] This dynamic interaction is hypothesized to be facilitated by bidirectional and potentially causal links between the auditory and motor areas in the brain (Fig. 2), including the motor cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical (mCBGT) circuit, that appear to be more developed in humans compared with nonhuman primates and related species.…”
Section: Macaquementioning
confidence: 99%