“…Canonical studies focus on the labor-market effects of immigration, largely in the United States after the transition to its current immigration regime in 1965 (e.g., Abramitzky and Boustan 2017;Borjas 2003Borjas , 2014Card 1990Card , 2005Hanson 2009;Kerr and Kerr 2011), with a smaller set focusing on the effects of immigration in other modern developed countries (e.g., Dustmann, Schönberg, and Stuhler 2016;Manacorda, Manning, and Wadsworth 2012). This literature is enriched by studies focusing on the effects of immigration in the United States during the Age of Mass Migration (e.g., Abramitzky et al 2023;Ager et al 2021;Cohen and Biddle 2022;Hatton and Williamson 1998;Price, vom Lehn, and Wilson 2023;Tabellini 2020), which exploit a variety of advantages of this historical setting, such as the long time horizon, open borders, the ability to follow individuals over time, and differences in economic structure to important feature of Brazilian immigration-was considered but was ultimately banned by the Foran Act in 1885. In the later years of the Age of Mass Migration, southern and eastern European immigrants were criticized for their supposed unwillingness to settle in the US South (Benton-Cohen 2018;Zimran 2022).…”