How the relative permittivity of solar cell materials influences solar cell performance

Abstract

The relative permittivity of the materials constituting heterojunction solar cells is usually not considered as a design parameter when searching for novel combinations of heterojunction materials. In this work, we investigate whether such an approach is valid. Specifically, we show the effect of the materials permittivity on the physics and performance of the solar cell by means of numerical simulation supported by analytical relations. We demonstrate that, depending on the specific solar cell configuration and materials properties, there are scenarios where the relative permittivity has a major influence on the achievable conversion efficiency, and scenarios where its influence can be safely ignored. In particular, we argue that high-permittivity materials should always be the preferred choice as heterojunction partners of the absorber layer when prototyping new materials combinations. When the heterojunction partner has a high permittivity, solar cells are consistently more robust against several non-idealities that are especially likely to occur in early-stage development, when the device is not yet optimized.

Vacancy defect modulation in hot-casted NiO film for efficient inverted planar perovskite solar cells

“…Permittivity should also be considered as large permittivity should be related to the power law changes in conductivity and dielectric loss according to the Kramers −Kronig relationships [49][50][51] . The relative permittivity-ramp rate curves were measured from dark-CELIV with hole only device of FTO/NiO x /PEDOT:PSS/Ag [2] .…”

Understanding the AC Equivalent Circuit Response of Ultrathin Cu(In,Ga)Se2Solar Cells

“…where ε 0 is the vacuum permittivity, ε is the dielectric constant, A is the area, and d is the width. The vacuum permittivity has a value of 8.8 × 10 −12 F/m, the CIGS dielectric constant is 13.6 [45], the Al 2 O 3 dielectric constant is 9 [46], the device area is 0.5 cm 2 , and d is the depletion region width of the p-n junction for each device or the Al 2 O 3 thickness for the passivation layer. Both net acceptors concentration (N cv ) and depletion region (ω) were estimated through capacitance-voltage-frequency (C-V-f) measurements.…”

Recent Progress on Cu2BaSn(SxSe1–x)4: From Material to Solar Cell Applications

“…The low PCE is due to the easy diffusion of O impurity into the CdS even at a lower temperature, resulting in the bandgap change of CdS. [146] In 2020, Xiao et al used the solution method to fabricate CSTS solar cells with the best PCE of 0.164%. [147] 6.…”