2014
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How tidal erosion has shaped the relation between globular cluster specific frequency and galaxy luminosity

Abstract: Aims.We quantify to what extent tidal erosion of globular clusters (GCs) has contributed to the observed U-shaped relation between GC specific frequencies S N and host galaxy luminosity M V . Methods. We used our Muesli code to calculate GC survival rates for typical early-type galaxy potentials covering a wide range of observed galaxy properties. We do this for isotropic and radially anisotropic GC velocity distributions. Results. We find that the calculated GC survival fraction, f s , depends linearly on the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
18
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a steepening of the relation with growing galactocentric radius can have significant implications for estimates of the initial number of GCs in galactic GC systems (e.g. Mieske, Küpper & Brockamp 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a steepening of the relation with growing galactocentric radius can have significant implications for estimates of the initial number of GCs in galactic GC systems (e.g. Mieske, Küpper & Brockamp 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall variation of S N vs. host galaxy M V is U -shaped, with a broad minimum between M V ∼ −18 and M V ∼ −20 where S N is typically of order unity, but reaching S N > 20-30 for some cD galaxies and dwarf galaxies (e.g., Peng et al 2008;Harris et al 2013). This trend may be driven partly by dynamical effects that lead to more efficient cluster disruption at intermediate host galaxy masses (e.g., Mieske et al 2014) and partly by variations in the "efficiency" of GC formation, relative to field stars (Peng et al 2008;Georgiev et al 2010). Interestingly, the trend of S N vs. host galaxy mass resembles that of total (dark matter) halo mass vs. stellar mass inferred from abundance matching (e.g.…”
Section: Introduction: Globular Clusters and Halo Stars In Different mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, when normalising the numbers of GCs to the host galaxy luminosities, expressed by the GC specific frequency (S N ≡ N GC × 10 0.4(M V +15) ; Harris & van den Bergh 1981), the well-known trend for S N to increase for lower luminosity galaxies becomes apparent. Data for larger samples of galaxies show that the behaviour of S N versus host galaxy absolute magnitude is actually U -shaped with a minimum between M V ∼ −18 and M V ∼ −20 (Harris et al 1991;Miller & Lotz 2007;Peng et al 2008;Georgiev et al 2010;Harris et al 2013;Mieske et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%