2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to achieve the goal of carbon peaking by the energy policy? A simulation using the DCGE model for the case of Shanghai, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to simulate the long-term impacts of carbon emission trading and renewable energy policies on the economy, environment, and energy, we have transformed the static CGE model into a dynamic CGE model using a recursive approach [30,46,47]. In general, the neoclassical macro-closure condition is preferred over Keynesian macro-closure and Lewis macro-closure in the long run, which means that all factors of production and goods are clear in the long run.…”
Section: Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to simulate the long-term impacts of carbon emission trading and renewable energy policies on the economy, environment, and energy, we have transformed the static CGE model into a dynamic CGE model using a recursive approach [30,46,47]. In general, the neoclassical macro-closure condition is preferred over Keynesian macro-closure and Lewis macro-closure in the long run, which means that all factors of production and goods are clear in the long run.…”
Section: Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To conduct our analysis, we will employ a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model, which is a widely-used method for evaluating the economic impacts of policy changes at both micro and macro levels [30][31][32]. What sets the CGE model apart from other approaches is its ability to capture the complex interactions and feedback effects between various economic sectors, including energy markets, and measure the distributional impacts across different income groups [33,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%