2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cptl.2015.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to analyze Likert and other rating scale data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
373
1
29

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 572 publications
(405 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
373
1
29
Order By: Relevance
“…The response variable for the intensity of the ZT illusion has seven distinct levels of responses going from “no ringing” to “loud and clear” which are ordered by their rank similar to a Likert‐type scale (Harpe, ; Pell, ; Stevens, ). Thus, the rating scale of the intensity of ZT illusion may be considered as an ordinal level variable.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response variable for the intensity of the ZT illusion has seven distinct levels of responses going from “no ringing” to “loud and clear” which are ordered by their rank similar to a Likert‐type scale (Harpe, ; Pell, ; Stevens, ). Thus, the rating scale of the intensity of ZT illusion may be considered as an ordinal level variable.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A set of the questionnaire used as instrument to collect a necessary data namely, demography profile and expertise point of views. Likert scale (Harpe, 2015;Likert, 1932) on Important (1 -Very Important, 2-Important, 3 -Neutral, 4-Unimportant, 5-Very Unimportant) implement on the influence entity in heritage building by item in each case. A pilot test was conducted to identify issues (Tadeu & Lucas, 2013) and to obtain information on the improvement of the questionnaire (Mohamed et al, 2012) that may arise before, during and after the actual data collection process.…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Chua Yan Piaw, (2013), due to a Likert scale approach, the mean value was not calculated because the input data is an ordinal data, the proper and a fair analysis for the output is mode and median approach. This rule stated that nonparametric statistical tests were appropriate, and the arithmetic mean the recommended statistic for interval data (Harpe, 2015), not an ordinal data. .…”
Section: Analysis and Findingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The options were: strongly disagree, disagree, neither agree nor disagree, agree, strongly agree, with numerical values 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, respectively. Likert scales, a common measurement method in educational contexts, are based on the idea that some underlying phenomenon can be measured by aggregating an individual's rating of students' feelings, attitudes, or perceptions related to a series of individual statements or items (Harpe, 2015). Mathematical attitudes and attitudes towards mathematics are not the same.…”
Section: The Experience Of Using the Tools In 2016mentioning
confidence: 99%