2007
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511481666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to Argue with an Economist

Abstract: This fascinating book reflects on how economics has become central to our lives, and how the 'economic rationalist' perspective has become the lens through which all matters in Australian public life are viewed. It explains how this economic worldview systematically overlooks important social issues and how it transforms Australian culture. How to Argue with an Economist invites a broad general audience into debates that were once reserved for experts. Lindy Edwards, a former economic adviser in the Prime Mini… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for this change are often ascribed to the emergence of the philosophical dominance of neo-liberalism 9 -a view of the world that appears to have both passionate advocates and critics. 10 Neo-liberalism became the philosophical benchmark in a post-Cold War world that venerated market outcomes above all else. The emergence of this neoliberal influence gave birth to 'economism'.…”
Section: B Addisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for this change are often ascribed to the emergence of the philosophical dominance of neo-liberalism 9 -a view of the world that appears to have both passionate advocates and critics. 10 Neo-liberalism became the philosophical benchmark in a post-Cold War world that venerated market outcomes above all else. The emergence of this neoliberal influence gave birth to 'economism'.…”
Section: B Addisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If there is anything outside this equation, it is only the imaginary ‘invisible hand’ of Adam Smith (cf. Edwards, 2007, p. 65) that serves as a pretext for ‘de‐regulation’, in other words once again putting everything on the same level. The de‐regulation is precisely that which removes any rules, any other order, or any ‘third place’ in Lacan's terms, by which a symbolic differentiation might be effected.…”
Section: All Are Equivalentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While governments have changed, the economic approach has not, even if it has softened a little. 2,6,7…”
Section: Economic Rationalism and Mental Health Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It implies that there is a natural order lying dormant under layers of government regulation. 6 Dufour 2 cites Karl Polanyi from his 1944 work, The Great Transformation , in a citation which currently seems quite prophetic:…”
Section: Economic Rationalism and Mental Health Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%