2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12520-018-00773-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to calculate the age at formation of Harris lines? A step-by-step review of current methods and a proposal for modifications to Byers’ formulas

Abstract: Harris lines (HL; also known as Bgrowth arrest lines^or Btransverse radiopaque lines^) are horizontal sclerotic lines formed in the metaphyseal or diaphyseal part of long bones, usually visualized using X-ray images. Among the factors that may lead to a temporary arrest of bone growth (and thus-to HL deposition), the most commonly mentioned are nutritional disorders (malnutrition, protein, vitamin, and mineral deficiencies), a history of smallpox, pneumonia or other diseases, food poisoning, or alcohol abuse. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of the fetal collection was confirmed in numerous previously published scientific studies (27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33). The scientific experience of the team has been confirmed in many works using anatomical scientific methodology and anatomical techniques used for statistical analysis (34)(35)(36).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The value of the fetal collection was confirmed in numerous previously published scientific studies (27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33). The scientific experience of the team has been confirmed in many works using anatomical scientific methodology and anatomical techniques used for statistical analysis (34)(35)(36).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…when mummies with metaphyseal and/or diaphyseal lines were counted and also a higher prevalence of 57% (12 out of 21) when only mummies with the typical diaphyseal lines were counted. In contrast to adults, diaphyseal transverse lines are more likely not resolved as the individuals were young (Kulus & Dąbrowski, 2019). However, early death of the children in the study reduced the years in which new transverse lines could have developed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Compared with the reported prevalences of Harris lines in a little over 30% (Gray, 1967) and in more than 50% (Lichtenberg, 2015) in collections of predominantly adult ancient Egyptian mummies, the collection of child mummies in this study had a substantially higher prevalence of 71% (15 out of 21) when mummies with metaphyseal and/or diaphyseal lines were counted and also a higher prevalence of 57% (12 out of 21) when only mummies with the typical diaphyseal lines were counted. In contrast to adults, diaphyseal transverse lines are more likely not resolved as the individuals were young (Kulus & Dąbrowski, 2019). However, early death of the children in the study reduced the years in which new transverse lines could have developed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The boy's biological age was estimated by X‐ray based on development of the permanent teeth (Smith, 1991; Štepanovský et al, 2017). Skeletal developmental anomalies and growth abnormalities (Scheuer & Black, 2000), including nonspecific stress indicators on the frontal permanent teeth (LEH; King et al, 2005) and long limb bones (HL; Lewis & Roberts, 1997; Kulus & Dąbrowski, 2019), were evaluated, also using X‐ray (Department of Anthropology, National Museum, Prague). The age at LEH formation was estimated using Reid and Dean's (2000) standards for the timing of anterior tooth growth.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%