2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-08954-1_101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to Deal with the Results of PLS-SEM?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…T A B L E 6 Reliability and validity analysis. large and this study achieved value of 0.478 (large) for attitude (Aburumman et al, 2022).…”
Section: Bootstrappingmentioning
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…T A B L E 6 Reliability and validity analysis. large and this study achieved value of 0.478 (large) for attitude (Aburumman et al, 2022).…”
Section: Bootstrappingmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…In Q 2 , value above zero is meaningful and we got 0.264 (attitude) and 0.25 (purchase intention) values in our empirical study. In f 2 , values 0.02, 0.15, and 0.35 are considered small, medium and large and this study achieved value of 0.478 (large) for attitude (Aburumman et al, 2022).…”
Section: R2 Q2 and F2mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Thus, these findings align with Hair et al (2019), who claimed that acceptable Cronbach's alpha and composite reliabil-ity values should fall between 0.70 and 0.95. Next, Table 3 shows that the average variance extracted (AVE) for all constructs obtained values greater than the indicated threshold values of 0.50 and above (Aburumman et al, 2023a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The measurement model evaluated internal consistency reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. According to Table 3, all items were valid because their loadings ranged from 0.729 to 0.932, following the recommendations of Aburumman et al (2023a). Additionally, Cronbach's alpha values for all components were between 0.823 and 0.926, and values for composite reliability were between 0.884 and 0.944.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine discriminant validity using Fornell-Larcker analysis, the square root of the AVE of each construct must be larger than its correlation with any other construct in the framework (Amora, 2021;Rabbi et al, 2021). Cronbach Alpha and Composite Dependability values, which typically range between 0.70 and 0.95 and are considered acceptable, can be used to assess the construct's reliability (Aburumman et al, 2023). At the evaluation stage of the structural model, the R 2 value is the indicator that should be analyzed.…”
Section: Data Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%