2003
DOI: 10.1515/flin.2003.37.3-4.399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to define and describe genres and styles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, I will argue that the intersubjective effect of certain person reference strategies, understood as taking into account the interlocutor, rather than the referentially ambiguous use itself, is crucial in order to explain the way these strategies function in certain genres and registers. Boundaries between genres are of course often vague (Saukkonen 2003). Similarly, various authors have argued that the oral-written distinction is scalar rather than dichotomous and crosscut by other axes such as planned-unplanned (Ochs 1979) or proximity and distance (Koch & Oesterreicher 1985).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, I will argue that the intersubjective effect of certain person reference strategies, understood as taking into account the interlocutor, rather than the referentially ambiguous use itself, is crucial in order to explain the way these strategies function in certain genres and registers. Boundaries between genres are of course often vague (Saukkonen 2003). Similarly, various authors have argued that the oral-written distinction is scalar rather than dichotomous and crosscut by other axes such as planned-unplanned (Ochs 1979) or proximity and distance (Koch & Oesterreicher 1985).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. I would like to point out that my use of the terms "register" and "genre" differs from the use of these terms by researchers working in the framework of systemic-functional linguistics, like, for exampleSaukkonen (2003).© 2018. John Benjamins Publishing Company All rights reserved…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%