2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10919-020-00352-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to Detect Altruists: Experiments Using a Zero-Acquaintance Video Presentation Paradigm

Abstract: In this study, we investigated the cognitive processes and nonverbal cues used to detect altruism in three experiments based on a zero-acquaintance video presentation paradigm. Cognitive mechanisms of altruism detection are thought to have evolved in humans to prevent subtle cheating. Several studies have demonstrated that people can correctly estimate levels of altruism in others. In this study, we asked participants to distinguish altruists from non-altruists in video clips using the Faith game. Participants… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Brown et al (2003) showed that people can detect altruists based on nonverbal cues. Oda et al (2009 , 2021) obtained similar results using 30-s video clips of natural conversations between Japanese individuals. After watching the video clips without sound, the participants correctly estimated the target individual’s level of altruism.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…For example, Brown et al (2003) showed that people can detect altruists based on nonverbal cues. Oda et al (2009 , 2021) obtained similar results using 30-s video clips of natural conversations between Japanese individuals. After watching the video clips without sound, the participants correctly estimated the target individual’s level of altruism.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Clearly, this argument also applies to other components of nonverbal communication, such as gestures and body language. However, the previous studies-including those mentioned above (the study by Centorrino et al, 2015, is a notable exception), as well as the later contributions by, e.g., Van Leeuwen et al (2018) and Oda et al (2021)-are typically based on visual stimuli which are strongly dissociated from the social context in which the predicted target behavior (i.e., detection of certain facets of cooperativeness, such as altruism, trustworthiness, reciprocity) occurs. This is either because the visual stimuli used therein only consist of a neutral mugshot picture (like in our first control condition-PHOTO) or a neutral video recording with made-up content (like in our second control condition-neutral video, henceforth VIDNE) 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this does not account for all the structures of the mind, some can be hypothesized and tested from an evolutionary standpoint. Indeed, research has shown that humans possess various cognitive functions adapted for positive assortment, such as the detection of cheaters and altruists (e.g., Cosmides,1989 ; Cosmides & Tooby, 1992 ; Oda et al, 2009 ; Oda et al, 2021 ), as well as memory biases enabling people to more accurately recall the face of a cheater compared to a non-cheater (e.g., Oda & Nakajima, 2010 ). Many of our emotions might also have evolved as adaptations to the positive assortment ( Trivers, 1971 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%