How to develop cost-conscious guidelines

Abstract

Non-UK purchasers will have to pay a small fee for post and packing. For European countries the cost is £2 per monograph and for the rest of the world £3 per monograph.You can order HTA monographs from our Despatch Agents:-fax (with credit card or official purchase order) -post (with credit card or official purchase order or cheque) -phone during office hours (credit card only).Additionally the HTA website allows you either to pay securely by credit card or to print out your order and then post or fax it. Contact Payment methods Paying by chequeIf you pay by cheque, the cheque must be in pounds sterling, made payable to Direct Mail Works Ltd and drawn on a bank with a UK address. Paying by credit cardThe following cards are accepted by phone, fax, post or via the website ordering pages: Delta, Eurocard, Mastercard, Solo, Switch and Visa. We advise against sending credit card details in a plain email. Paying by official purchase orderYou can post or fax these, but they must be from public bodies (i.e. NHS or universities) within the UK.We cannot at present accept purchase orders from commercial companies or from outside the UK. How do I get a copy of HTA on CD?Please use the form on the HTA website (www.hta.ac.uk/htacd.htm). Or contact Direct Mail Works (see contact details above) by email, post, fax or phone. HTA on CD is currently free of charge worldwide.The website also provides information about the HTA Programme and lists the membership of the various committees. HTA How to develop cost-conscious guidelines NHS R&D HTA ProgrammeT he NHS R&D Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme was set up in 1993 to ensure that high-quality research information on the costs, effectiveness and broader impact of health technologies is produced in the most efficient way for those who use, manage and provide care in the NHS.Initially, six HTA panels (pharmaceuticals, acute sector, primary and community care, diagnostics and imaging, population screening, methodology) helped to set the research priorities for the HTA Programme. However, during the past few years there have been a number of changes in and around NHS R&D, such as the establishment of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) and the creation of three new research programmes: Service Delivery and Organisation (SDO); New and Emerging Applications of Technology (NEAT); and the Methodology Programme.Although the National Coordinating Centre for Health Technology Assessment (NCCHTA) commissions research on behalf of the Methodology Programme, it is the Methodology Group that now considers and advises the Methodology Programme Director on the best research projects to pursue.The research reported in this monograph was funded as project number 94/08/28.The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Methodology Programme, HTA Programme or the Department of Health. The editors wish to emphasise that funding and publication of this research by the NHS should not be taken as implicit support for any reco...

Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies

“…Further, for many areas of clinical care, robust evidence on the costeffectiveness of clinical interventions is not available and few guidelines have incorporated economic considerations when deriving recommendations. 33 As a result, it is unlikely that decision-makers will be able to replicate the sophisticated modelling approach demonstrated by Mason and colleagues. 24 Nevertheless, decisionmakers can use a similar framework to guide their decisions about how best to use the limited resources they have for clinical governance and related activities to maximise population benefits.…”

Health Informatics: The Relevance of Open Source and Multilevel Modeling

“…There are some recent publications (since 2005) about the use of XML Schema languages as an attempt to perform a posteriori standardization of data types and metadata [28,32], development of templates for structured documents [27,35], or any combination of the techniques cited above [10,13,29], what can be understood as solutions to promote data interchange between one-level based information systems.…”

Validity and reliability of physical employment standards

“…It is illuminating to compare the level of evidence used to establish the MPS of a PES with that widely used by the scientific and medical community (e.g., the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria for the grading of literature and procedures (sign.ac.uk/index.html); levels of evidence (Eccles and Mason 2001)); these criteria are presented in Table 3. These criteria place a large emphasis on systematic, randomized controlled trials with very low risk of bias; evidence produced by objective, quantitative means are ranked higher than other forms of evidence that rely on subjective, qualitative data collection.…”