2016
DOI: 10.1007/s13244-016-0469-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to diagnose acute appendicitis: ultrasound first

Abstract: Acute appendicitis (AA) is a common abdominal emergency with a lifetime prevalence of about 7 %. As the clinical diagnosis of AA remains a challenge to emergency physicians and surgeons, imaging modalities have gained major importance in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected AA in order to keep both the negative appendectomy rate and the perforation rate low. Introduced in 1986, graded-compression ultrasound (US) has well-established direct and indirect signs for diagnosing AA. In our opinion, US s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
98
1
13

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
98
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…11 Ultrasound appendix size more than 1 cm does not predict the difficulty in laparoscopic appendectomy whereas peri appendicular collection significantly predicts the difficulty of laparoscopic appendectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…11 Ultrasound appendix size more than 1 cm does not predict the difficulty in laparoscopic appendectomy whereas peri appendicular collection significantly predicts the difficulty of laparoscopic appendectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Clinical tests, pathology and diagnostic imaging play a valuable role in stratifying the risk of the condition. Ultrasound is accepted as the first line imaging modality in children, due to the risk from ionising radiation inherent to computed tomography . The value of appendiceal ultrasound to referring clinicians is contingent upon the effect on pre‐test probability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En cuanto a la ecografía, impresiona como poco utilizada para tratarse de pacientes en los cuales, por el resultado anátomo-patológico final, uno supondría que no han de haber sido de fácil diagnóstico por la clínica. Dado que este trabajo no analizó la clínica de estos pacientes ni el tiempo transcurrido entre que el cirujano tomó contacto con el mismo y el momento en que se resolvió la indicación quirúrgica, nos faltan elementos para analizar el hecho, de que gran parte de estos pacientes fue operado a pesar de una ecografía que disminuía en gran medida las probabilidades de estar frente a una apendicitis aguda (20) (21)(22) (23) .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified