2020
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to disentangle geometry and mass-loss rate from AGB-star spectral energy distributions

Abstract: Context. High-angular-resolution observations of asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars often reveal non-spherical morphologies for the gas and dust envelopes. Aims. We aim to make a pilot study to quantify the impact of different geometries (spherically symmetric, spiral-shaped, and disc-shaped) of the dust component of AGB envelopes on spectral energy distributions (SEDs), mass estimates, and subsequent mass-loss rate (MLR) estimates. We also estimate the error made on the MLR if the SED is fitted by an inappro… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…´-10 6 M e yr −1 , similar to values previously derived using DUSTY modeling when accounting for the different assumptions for the distance (Bogdanov & Taranova 2001). 9 These mass loss rates, however, should be used with caution because incorrect model geometry can have a considerable impact on the derived mass loss rates (Wiegert et al 2020). Additionally, the system's outburst(s) may result in more-significant episodic mass loss.…”
Section: D Radiative Transfer Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…´-10 6 M e yr −1 , similar to values previously derived using DUSTY modeling when accounting for the different assumptions for the distance (Bogdanov & Taranova 2001). 9 These mass loss rates, however, should be used with caution because incorrect model geometry can have a considerable impact on the derived mass loss rates (Wiegert et al 2020). Additionally, the system's outburst(s) may result in more-significant episodic mass loss.…”
Section: D Radiative Transfer Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This opens up the question of an alternative, non-isotropic, dust density distribution for the DE sources as, for instance, suggested by Decin et al (2019) for evolved OH/IR stars. This can be analysed along the lines of Wiegert et al (2020), but it would lead too far to test this out in detail in this paper. The conclusion for now is that there is no obvious way to produce the amount of emission we see with significantly less dust, and hence increase the R gd .…”
Section: Objects With Detached Dust Csesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The investigations of AGB stars by several authors have led to a better understanding of this important phase of stellar evolution (e.g., Habing 1996;Lançon et al 1999;Piovan et al 2003;Herwig 2005;Woitke 2006; Karakas & Lattanzio 2007;Poelarends et al 2008;Ramstedt et al 2008;Weiss & Ferguson 2009;Karakas 2010;Ventura & Marigo 2010;Ventura et al 2012;Di Criscienzo et al 2013;García-Hernández et al 2013;Girardi et al 2013;Placco et al 2013;Kalirai et al 2014;Cristallo et al 2015;Battino et al 2016;Goldman et al 2017;Brunner et al 2019;Goldman et al 2019;McDonald & Trabucchi 2019;Girardi et al 2020;Pastorelli et al 2020;Wiegert et al 2020). However, the overall impact of TP-AGB 4 stars on stellar populations of galaxies is not well understood, and has been a matter of debate during the last fifteen years (e.g., Marigo et al 2010;Marigo 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%