2011
DOI: 10.1177/197140091102400219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to Distinguish between Venous and Arterial Strokes and Why?

Abstract: Cerebral venous infarct is considered to be rare (0-5% of all strokes). In some cases venous infarcts with no specific signs on conventional CT or MR study are not diagnosed due to incomplete examination. A venous infarct more often (63%) than an arterial (15%) infarct is accompanied by hemorrhage (primary or secondary in the early period) and a high risk of hemorrhage should be a contraindication to intravenous thrombolysis. Consequently, the definition of the kind of a stroke should lead to different therape… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 Guidelines in human medicine for diagnosing venous infarction include: infarction not conforming to a major arterial vascular territory, crossing the typical arterial boundaries, or extending over more than one arterial distribution; presence of multiple isolated lesions; involvement of subcortical regions with sparing of the cortex, or cortical-subcortical topography; often hemorrhagic component; proximity to a venous sinus. [24][25][26][27][28] The retrograde venous pressure caused by thrombosis severely reduces the cerebral blood flow through a vicious cycle of increased intracranial pressure, blood-brain barrier disruption with edema and hemorrhage, and reduced CSF drainage, leading to neuroparenchymal ischemia and necrosis. 23,26,29,30 The restricted diffusion in acute venous thrombosis suggests that cytotoxic edema is mainly responsible for the MRI changes, and that vasogenic edema follows but is not the primary pathological event.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…22 Guidelines in human medicine for diagnosing venous infarction include: infarction not conforming to a major arterial vascular territory, crossing the typical arterial boundaries, or extending over more than one arterial distribution; presence of multiple isolated lesions; involvement of subcortical regions with sparing of the cortex, or cortical-subcortical topography; often hemorrhagic component; proximity to a venous sinus. [24][25][26][27][28] The retrograde venous pressure caused by thrombosis severely reduces the cerebral blood flow through a vicious cycle of increased intracranial pressure, blood-brain barrier disruption with edema and hemorrhage, and reduced CSF drainage, leading to neuroparenchymal ischemia and necrosis. 23,26,29,30 The restricted diffusion in acute venous thrombosis suggests that cytotoxic edema is mainly responsible for the MRI changes, and that vasogenic edema follows but is not the primary pathological event.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33,34 Venous infarction is more frequently accompanied by hemorrhage because of venous stasis and rupture of the blood-brain barrier. 27,30,32 In such cases, blood is intermixed with edematous brain tissue. Intraparenchymal hemorrhage may also occur following vessel disruption, leading to a primary hematoma without an ischemic component.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CMBs and the lacunar infarctions may be unrelated events on juxtapositioned vessels, or the CMB may be haemorrhagic conversion of the arterial or venous infarction. 8 On the other hand, the locations of the CMBs relative to the infarction areas may suggest a causal relationship to the lacunar infarcts, that is, occlusion of the lenticulostriatal branches leading to infarction of their supplying territories. CMBs are considered to arise as small perivascular bleedings in the acute phase, and to change to focal accumulation of hemosiderin-containing macrophages at least several days after the bleeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The widespread use of diffusion and perfusion protocols that allow detecting edema and perfusion disorders already in the first hours of the disease has led to the loss of relevance of the classification of venous ischemia based on the abnormality of the T2WI signal on MRI [66]. Lesion localization close to a thrombosed sinus or vein is not typical for the arterial stroke [75]. MR images contrast enhancement allows one to see a symptom similar to empty delta sign symptom on CT in thrombotic sinus occlusion [76] when on T1WIagainst the background of contrast-enhanced sinus walls as a thrombus in the sinus lumen -looks much less intense.…”
Section: The Native Ct Of the Brain Is Performed Everywhere Immediate...mentioning
confidence: 99%